Hello! What is your opinion on the combo [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f]? Classic or generic? Should I change the middle? (Any suggestions are welcomed)
Thanks!
I think it’s pretty, but I prefer [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
2 Likes
It’s beautiful! I don’t think you should change anything 
Rose [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is a beautiful classic!
I love [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f]! I think it’s classic and unexpected, because I’ve met so many people named [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f].
I think it’s beautiful, but for me, [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Amelie[/name_f] just flows a little better. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is absolutely gorgeous though.
3 Likes
Rose [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is beautiful! While [name_f]Rose[/name_f] isn’t exactly a rare name, I haven’t heard of many baby [name_f]Rose[/name_f]’s recently and so in my mind, [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is more classic right now. I don’t think you should change the middle name, [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is a great addition to [name_f]Rose[/name_f].
Absolutely a classic!
Rose [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is very classic and sweet
It’s lovely, but I would say that [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] flows better
1 Like
Rose [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is a lovely, classic combo!
I think [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] would feel generic to me because the fn is a top 10 name and the mn is a very common mn – there are probably a million [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] Roses out there. But [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is less common as a fn nowadays and [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] makes a very elegant mn for it! The flow is great, too.
1 Like
Classic. But a tiny bit generic. [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Amelie[/name_f]?
Rose [name_f]Amelia[/name_f] is gorgeous! I love seeing [name_f]Rose[/name_f] as a first name