[name_f]Greer[/name_f] [name_f]Winslet[/name_f] – Too surname-y. [name_u]Adair[/name_u] is a lovely option if you like [name_f]Greer[/name_f].
[name_f]Laurel[/name_f] [name_f]Mazarine[/name_f] – A little odd. For some reason I find [name_f]Laurel[/name_f] dated (maybe because the Laurels I know are all in the same age range) and [name_f]Mazarine[/name_f] is interesting but has some weird sound associations for me: Nectarine, Mezzanine, Nazarene.
[name_f]Gwyneth[/name_f] [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] – Interesting and surprising combo. I’m not a huge [name_f]Gwen[/name_f] fan so I want to flip this to [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Gwyneth[/name_f]. But that’s totally personal thinking. I like it. I do really love [name_f]Gwyneira[/name_f], for a random suggestion.
[name_f]Corina[/name_f] [name_u]Meredith[/name_u] – Really like this. Great balance and not two names I would think to put together but makes sense to.
[name_f]Gwenna[/name_f] [name_f]Laurel[/name_f] – Interesting. I find both names a little bland, with [name_f]Gwenna[/name_f] simply sounding like a twist on [name_f]Gwen[/name_f] and [name_f]Gemma[/name_f]/[name_f]Jenna[/name_f] / [name_f]Glenna[/name_f]. I do think the combo has nice balance though.
[name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] – [name_f]Emma[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] would be so boring, but [name_f]Emilia[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is lovely. I do like the name [name_f]Jane[/name_f], even though it’s a bit filler.
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] – I find this one a little….predictable. Both names are very popular and as I’ve heard both names quite a bit, the combo lacks spark to me. I do like both names individually though. [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Olive[/name_f] or [name_f]Lucienne[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] or [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] Oliviette would be a but more creative and memorable.
[name_f]Mila[/name_f] [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] – I really like this! [name_f]Mila[/name_f] is a simple yet elegant name and [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] is quite bold. I think it’s well balanced.
[name_f]Thea[/name_f] [name_f]Delphine[/name_f] – [name_u]Love[/name_u] this.
[name_f]Winslet[/name_f] [name_f]Olivine[/name_f] – Prefer other forms of [name_f]Olivia[/name_f]. [name_f]Winslet[/name_f] just doesn’t do it for me. The flow is a bit off, speaking from a objective point.
[name_f]Sabrina[/name_f] [name_f]Gwyneth[/name_f] – The flow isn’t quite right with this one either, but not terrible. I know many [name_f]Sabrinas[/name_f] and have good connections to the name. I also really like [name_f]Sabina[/name_f].
I know an [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] [name_f]Lucy[/name_f]!
I prefer [name_f]Sabina[/name_f] to [name_f]Sabrina[/name_f]. [name_f]Sabina[/name_f] [name_f]Greer[/name_f]? I’m not really a fan of your current combos. [name_f]Jane[/name_f] is lovely ([name_f]Thea[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Mila[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]).
[name_f]Greer[/name_f] and [name_f]Winslet[/name_f] instantly stuck out to me as sisters. Obviously, you’d have to change [name_f]Greer[/name_f]'s middle name (although, as a singleton or only girl or other option I find [name_f]Greer[/name_f] [name_f]Winslet[/name_f] to be stunning…) if you went with [name_f]Winslet[/name_f] as her sister.