Thoughts on using a name used previously for a loved childhood family dog? It’s Chloe

Have always loved the name Chloe, so it’s frustrating that my mum used it for our (now passed) much loved family dog when I was younger.

I like the way it sounds, I like that I don’t know anybody with that name (other than lovely Chloe dog) I like the name meaning.

What are your thoughts? Is it a no go or worth considering?

1 Like

For me I would gage reactions from family before going ahead with it. Funnily enough we had a family dog called Chloe and I think if I had named my daughter Chloe my family would have found it odd. But your family may see it as a sweet or not think anything off it. So I would run it passed your family first.

I agree that discussing with family is a good thing to do. I would tell them why you like the name. It’s ok if they think it’s odd though.

1 Like

[name_f]My[/name_f] mom actually suggested I used a now passed family dog name for my baby due this summer (Molly). I would have considered it, except my husband vetoed the name immediately unrelated to the dog connection.

I agree with others to gage family reactions first, but personally I see no issue. We name children after loved ones all the time and animals are our loved ones too!

1 Like

Absolutely usable in my opinion. The only time I would find it unusable is if it was a current pet of your immediate family.

1 Like

I’d suggest that too. I’ve mentioned using names we’ve used on guinea pigs in the past to my mum, and she didn’t see why they’d be unusable :person_shrugging: Chloe is a bright, lovely and familiar name, so I think if your family are cool with it, I think it’s usable. If not, maybe as a middle?

2 Likes

I’d use it. I have a cat named [name_u]Neo[/name_u] who is very much alive and [name_u]Cleo[/name_u] is still on my list. lol And I had a dog named [name_f]Maggie[/name_f] as a kid and would definitely use [name_f]Magdalen[/name_f] NN [name_f]Maggie[/name_f] for a child.

1 Like

I don’t see any reason not to use it but its up to you

I say go for it. I seriously considered [name_u]Charlie[/name_u], which had the same issue for us. The decision not to use it was just because we found other names we preferred.

I say go for it, my ds has the same name as one of my husbands childhood pets.

I named my son [name_u]Leo[/name_u], it was his childhood dogs name. It’s fine :sweat_smile:

1 Like

[name_m]Steve[/name_m] [name_m]Irwin[/name_m] did it (daughter [name_f]Bindi[/name_f] [name_f]Sue[/name_f] - named after a beloved crocodile, [name_f]Bindi[/name_f], and dog, Sue).
I say go right ahead if you love it!

2 Likes

[name_f]Beloved[/name_f] crocodile :smile: This is cute! :smile::blush:
I just wanted comment again - my dog’s name is Thorbjorn (bf named him. He is more his big baby :smile:) and I still would use [name_m]Thor[/name_m] or [name_m]Thorin[/name_m] or something like that. Absolutely love [name_m]Thor[/name_m] names. :blush:

2 Likes