Husbands MN is [name_m]Todd[/name_m], we know we will use one form to honor him. Which name do you prefer? [name_f]Do[/name_f] you think [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is usable as FN or only MN? I like the idea of [name_m]Todd[/name_m] with option of [name_m]Fox[/name_m] as NN. Have any ideas of great pairings as first or middle? I’m liking…
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]
[name_m]Fox[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u]
[name_m]Todd[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u]
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]
I think [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is such a cool middle name (what a neat way to honour your husband!!), and [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is incredibly handsome.
I also like [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m], but the possibility of [name_u]Teddy[/name_u] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is just a little much, in my opinion.
I absolutely adore the name [name_m]Fox[/name_m], especially as a FN, however from your list I must say [name_m]Todd[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] is my favorite. I’m a bit more traditional when it comes to honor names and like to keep the name the same. I do think [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is a nice combination too and the flow is pretty nice if you really want [name_m]Fox[/name_m]. I’ve never came across a [name_m]Todd[/name_m] before though and the name is simple, well-known, under used and in my opinion a hidden gem.
I prefer [name_m]Todd[/name_m]. [name_m]Fox[/name_m]'s popularity on this website baffles me.
I prefer [name_m]Fox[/name_m]. [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] would get my vote.
I do love [name_m]Fox[/name_m], as you can see by my signature. I’m not sure if I’d use it as a first name, is it too animalish? But I absolutely love it in the middle. [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is such a handsome name.
I kinda like [name_m]Fox[/name_m] better than [name_m]Todd[/name_m] as a mn. Feels fresher and more on point.
I don’t think I’d try to do both. Feels a little redundant. I can understand wanting to use a T fn but there are a tone that don’t suggest [name_m]Todd[/name_m] as a potential nn.
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is awesome. BTW.
[name_f]Adore[/name_f] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]…[name_m]Fox[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u]!
My vote would be for [name_m]Fox[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u]!
My sons name is [name_m]Soren[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]! It suits him and we love it!
[name_m]Todd[/name_m] is really dated to me right now so I prefer [name_m]Fox[/name_m]. My favorite of your combos is [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]. [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is handsome too. I also like [name_u]Wallace[/name_u], but [name_m]Fox[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] kind of runs together. Looks great on paper tho.
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is quite handsome.
I adore the name [name_m]Todd[/name_m]. In my mind I associate the name with [name_m]Fox[/name_m] since that was the name of the fox in the Disney movie - ‘The [name_m]Fox[/name_m] and the Hound’. So I think [name_m]Todd[/name_m] with the nickname [name_m]Fox[/name_m] would be cute.
Out of the other options, I also like [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m].
I prefer [name_m]Fox[/name_m]. Very nice name. Your post made me think of The [name_m]Fox[/name_m] and the Hound, like [name_m]Tod[/name_m] the [name_m]Fox[/name_m] lol
[name_m]Fox[/name_m] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Thomas[/name_m]
Or
[name_m]Todd[/name_m] [name_u]Wallace[/name_u] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]
I feel like [name_m]Todd[/name_m] is very 70’s and [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is very now. I much prefer [name_m]Fox[/name_m] in the middle spot. [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m] is super handsome!
I would use [name_m]Todd[/name_m] [name_m]Fox[/name_m]!! 