Too much of a stretch?

Girl Names
1

This is all hypothetical, no real baby-naming going on. But is [name]Bree[/name_f] too much of a stretch to be a nn for [name]Bryn[/name_f]? I know it doesn’t really need one, it’s already short enough on its own, but it doesn’t hurt to have one.

2

No, I think it works!

3

Not a stretch at all!

1 Like
4

I think it works!

1 Like
5

I personally don’t really see it - They only share two letters, however if YOU see it and YOU like it, then why not? :slight_smile:

My favourite nickname for Evaluna is [name_f]Lulu[/name_f], which is only two letters in common!

2 Likes
7

Exactly!

1 Like
8

I think it works :slightly_smiling_face::slightly_smiling_face:

9

I don’t really think it works.

10

I dont really see it, but thats not a bad thing. If you like it, and youd like to use it… Use it!

11

As a [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] myself, I don’t see it. [name_f]My[/name_f] name occasionally get misheard as [name_f]Bree[/name_f] which I don’t like, and I think of them as 2 separate names. [name_f]My[/name_f] family while I was growing up and my current SO call me Brynnie sometimes, but for the most part I really don’t think [name_u]Bryn[/name_u] needs a nickname

12

I think it could work but [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] is so short i probably wouldn’t use a nickname

1 Like
13

Not stretch at all. Although I can’t see the point of it - both have the same amount of syllables.

1 Like