What do you think of [name_m]Christopher[/name_m], [name_m]Philip[/name_m], and [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] (nn [name_u]Kit[/name_u], [name_m]Pip[/name_m], & [name_f]Maisie[/name_f]) for hypothetical future triplets? I also like [name_m]William[/name_m] (nn [name_m]Wills[/name_m]), [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] (nn [name_f]Kate[/name_f]), and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] (nn [name_f]Lily[/name_f]) as other options. Other names I love are [name_f]Emilia[/name_f], [name_f]Virginia[/name_f] ([name_f]Ginny[/name_f]), [name_m]Henry[/name_m] ([name_m]Harry[/name_m]), & [name_m]Anthony[/name_m].
I think [name_f]Maisie[/name_f] would rarely (if ever) go by [name_f]Margaret[/name_f], and [name_u]Kit[/name_u] & [name_m]Pip[/name_m] would probably only be used when the boys were little unless they love the nicknames as much as I do.
I think [name_m]Christopher[/name_m], [name_m]Philip[/name_m] and [name_f]Margaret[/name_f] are perfect names for triplets, and I really like [name_u]Kit[/name_u] and [name_f]Maisie[/name_f] together, but [name_m]Pip[/name_m] seems a bit odd next to [name_u]Kit[/name_u]. I think [name_u]Kit[/name_u], [name_m]Harry[/name_m] and [name_f]Maisie[/name_f] would be better, or [name_u]Kit[/name_u], [name_m]Wills[/name_m] and [name_f]Maisie[/name_f].
I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u], [name_m]Pip[/name_m] and [name_f]Maisie[/name_f] together! I think it’s adorable. I actually have [name_u]Percy[/name_u] nn [name_m]Pip[/name_m] on my shortlist, as well as [name_u]Kit[/name_u]! Their full names all go together stylistically and flow well, so no complaints there. I also think [name_m]Wills[/name_m], [name_f]Kate[/name_f] and [name_f]Lily[/name_f] would make excellent suggestions for potential future siblings! Other suggestions and combinations (if you want any):
I love [name_u]Kit[/name_u], [name_m]Pip[/name_m] and [name_f]Maisie[/name_f]! Your other options are great too.
While it doesn’t sound like you plan on it I would definitely avoid having [name_m]William[/name_m] and [name_f]Catherine[/name_f], especially with the nn [name_m]Wills[/name_m] and [name_f]Kate[/name_f] together. Far too British royalty! I’d also avoid either of those if you choose to use [name_m]Henry[/name_m] with the nn [name_m]Harry[/name_m], for the same reason ([name_m]Henry[/name_m] with no nn would be fine). All fantastic names though!