I am expecting twin girls in [name_f]February[/name_f]. I already have a little boy named [name_m]Court[/name_m] and a little girl named [name_u]Charley[/name_u].
I would really like to use some family names (maybe as middle names) - but they seem very masculine.
Family names:
Burge
Looper
Sellars
[name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]
[name_u]Dale[/name_u]
To me, Looper and Burge aren’t useable on real children so I only used Sellars, [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f] and [name_u]Dale[/name_u]. I love your list of names, although [name_u]Parker[/name_u] is a boys’ name in my eyes.
I like:
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_u]Parker[/name_u] and [name_f]Molly[/name_f] [name_u]Emerson[/name_u]
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_u]Parker[/name_u] and [name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_u]Emerson[/name_u]
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_u]Parker[/name_u] and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]
[name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] and [name_f]Nora[/name_f] [name_f]Jane[/name_f]
I am assuming your daughter [name_u]Charley[/name_u] is not [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] with [name_u]Charley[/name_u] as a nickname. If that is true I would think unisex names would be more to your liking. I could imagine a subset of…
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emerson[/name_u] and [name_u]Parker[/name_u]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u]* and [name_u]Avery[/name_u]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u] and [name_u]Hadley[/name_u]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u] and [name_u]Finley[/name_u]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u] and [name_f]Waverley[/name_f]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u] and [name_u]Riley[/name_u]
[name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emery[/name_u] and [name_f]Kinsley[/name_f]
*[name_u]Everly[/name_u] could be substituted for [name_u]Emery[/name_u]
Personally, I would either do all the girls’ names ending in the long ee sound or just [name_u]Charley[/name_u], but I would not do one of the twins and not the other. That is why [name_m]Court[/name_m], [name_u]Charley[/name_u], [name_u]Emerson[/name_u] and [name_u]Parker[/name_u] work so well. They each have a different ending.
[name_u]Emerson[/name_u] [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]-[name_u]Dale[/name_u] and [name_u]Parker[/name_u] [name_f]Susannah[/name_f]-Sellars
or [name_f]Serena[/name_f]-Sellars, [name_f]Sarah[/name_f]-Sellars
[name_u]Ruby[/name_u] [name_u]Dale[/name_u] and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]? Is the double matching initials too much for you? It reads very wizard of [name_m]Oz[/name_m] heavy (ruby slippers + [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]) but if that’s a film you happen to love then why not?
Or [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_u]Dale[/name_u] and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Dorothy[/name_f]? I feel you need a very feminine first name to carry off [name_u]Dale[/name_u] as a MN - then probably also a feminine name for the other twin to tie them together.
I love [name_u]Dale[/name_u] for a girl! I even like it as a first name, [name_u]Dale[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or [name_u]Dale[/name_u] [name_f]Jane[/name_f].