[name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_u]River[/name_u] & [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] I like [name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] too, but [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_u]River[/name_u] sounds masculine.
I like [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] with either MN (although I do agree that [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is more feminine than [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_u]River[/name_u]), but I much prefer [name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] to [name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_u]River[/name_u]. [name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_u]River[/name_u] runs together in a bad way to my ears, like it’s actually supposed to be [name_f]Willow[/name_f] [name_u]River[/name_u] but got cut off.
[name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_u]River[/name_u] has too many “iii” sounds (like in ‘ill’). While pretty, I think [name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] sounds wispy and insubstantial. [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_u]River[/name_u] reminds me of the Shenandoah [name_u]River[/name_u] and reminds me of a barefoot country boy from the 1800s. Maybe that’s not a bad thing, kinda cute, lol. [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is a beautiful name with a lot of wonderful meaning.