Twins Need Names!

We are having two baby girls and we can’t agree on any names.

My husband’s favorites are:
[name_u]Morgan[/name_u]
[name_u]Taylor[/name_u]
[name_u]Parker[/name_u]
[name_f]Ella[/name_f]
[name_f]Grace[/name_f]
[name_u]Wren[/name_u]
[name_f]Madeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Noelle[/name_f]
[name_u]Addison[/name_u]
[name_f]Braelyn[/name_f]

Mine are:
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f]
[name_f]Hannah[/name_f]
[name_f]Elsa[/name_f]/[name_f]Elsie[/name_f]
[name_f]Brynn[/name_f]
[name_u]Rylan[/name_u]

We both like [name_u]Harper[/name_u] so may use that, but are stuck on another potential name. I like [name_f]Noelle[/name_f] a lot but the girls will be born in [name_f]May[/name_f]/[name_u]June[/name_u].

Please help!

I like [name_f]Grace[/name_f] and [name_f]Audrey[/name_f].

ill suggest:

[name_u]Wren[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]
[name_f]Claire[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]

[name_m]Just[/name_m] from.your list I would choose [name_u]Wren[/name_u] and [name_f]Audrey[/name_f] :slight_smile:

you should pick one from each list! i like [name_u]Taylor[/name_u] and [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] :slight_smile:

It seems pretty easy to split your lists into two categories-- contemporary feminine, and androgynous girl unisex. The two styles aren’t 100% incompatible, but you might want to decide which to type use and stick to it. I don’t think twins with one having a totally feminine name and the other unisex is really very good; it sets up the possibility of challenging expectations. I’d go through and split your combined list in two along those lines, so:

Contemporary Feminine:
[name_f]Ella[/name_f]
[name_f]Grace[/name_f]
[name_f]Madeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Noelle[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f]
[name_f]Hannah[/name_f]
[name_f]Elsa[/name_f]

Androgynous girly unisex:
[name_u]Morgan[/name_u]
[name_u]Taylor[/name_u]
[name_u]Parker[/name_u]
[name_u]Addison[/name_u]
[name_u]Rylan[/name_u]
[name_u]Harper[/name_u]

In between the categories:
[name_f]Braelyn[/name_f]
[name_f]Brynn[/name_f]
[name_u]Wren[/name_u]

Now, as for picking the two names I’d suggest looking over the list together and crossing off any that either of you feels they really can’t stand. Then I’d suggest picking between the categories, and eliminating all the names from the category you can agree to let go of. [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] and [name_u]Wren[/name_u] sort of transcend the categories and can really go with names from either grouping, so leave those in limbo (unless you or your husband eliminates them). Then, from the chosen category, you can each pick a first name that you like. All of the earlier names can come back into play as potential middle names.

If I were you and had 100% control of the process, I’d pick [name_u]Harper[/name_u] and [name_u]Wren[/name_u], or [name_f]Grace[/name_f] and [name_f]Madeline[/name_f].

[name_u]Harper[/name_u] and [name_u]Wren[/name_u] do go together. We are planning on using family names as MN so it would be [name_u]Harper[/name_u] [name_f]Eve[/name_f] and [name_u]Wren[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f].

I like [name_f]Brynn[/name_f] more than [name_u]Wren[/name_u]. What kind of MN work with [name_f]Brynn[/name_f].

I think [name_u]Harper[/name_u] [name_f]Eve[/name_f] and [name_u]Wren[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] or [name_u]Harper[/name_u] [name_f]Eve[/name_f] and [name_u]Bryn[/name_u] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] sound wonderful together.

[name_f]Audrey[/name_f] and [name_f]Madeline[/name_f] make a great sibset!

I love:

[name_f]Madeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Elsa[/name_f]
[name_f]Audrey[/name_f]
[name_f]Grace[/name_f]
[name_f]Ella[/name_f]
[name_u]Morgan[/name_u]

[name_f]Elsa[/name_f] was also in the mix.

What about [name_u]Harper[/name_u] [name_f]Eve[/name_f] and [name_f]Elsa[/name_f] ??