Twins plus one = 3 sweet little boys; help naming #3

Okay, the time has come for me to ask the Berries’ opinions on a great name for our third sweet little boy, due mid-February. You were instrumental in helping us choose perfect names for our identical twin boys back in [name_f]April[/name_f], 2012, and I need your amazing tastes and ideas yet again!

Our twin boys are [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] [name_m]Robert[/name_m] and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] [name_u]Ryan[/name_u]. [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] goes solely by [name_m]Andrew[/name_m], and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] is either [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] or [name_m]Ben[/name_m]. Last name is Lithuanian, 3 syllables, starts with a D, heavy on the A’s and ends with S.

We are looking for another classic, handsome name for [name_m]Ben[/name_m] and [name_m]Andrew[/name_m]'s little brother. We’ve narrowed our list down to the following firsts and middles, though are open to other suggestions for both:

First names (no particular order, though at the moment we are probably leaning towards one of the first 4):

[name_m]Alexander[/name_m] ([name_u]Alex[/name_u] or [name_m]Xan[/name_m] as nns)
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] ([name_u]Jay[/name_u] or [name_m]Jake[/name_m] as nns)
[name_m]Jonathan[/name_m]
[name_u]Michael[/name_u]
[name_m]Gideon[/name_m]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m]
[name_m]Dawson[/name_m] (not as “classic”, but we both really like it and it sounds good with the last name)
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m]
[name_m]Gabriel[/name_m] (I really like this name; hubby not so much)
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] (though it might be weird to have the one non-twin named “the twin”, no?)

Middle names (none of these can be used as first names, for various reasons):

[name_m]David[/name_m]
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]
[name_m]Charles[/name_m]
[name_m]Gordon[/name_m] (these first 4 are all family names, but we aren’t stuck on using a family name for the middle)
[name_u]James[/name_u]
[name_m]Night[/name_m]
[name_m]Shepherd[/name_m]
[name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Remington[/name_m]
[name_m]Tennyson[/name_m] (these last two might be too long with the last name?)

Names we like but can’t use as firsts: [name_m]Jack[/name_m], [name_m]William[/name_m], [name_m]Matthew[/name_m]/[name_m]Matthias[/name_m], [name_m]Mark[/name_m], [name_m]Jacob[/name_m], [name_m]Adam[/name_m], [name_m]Ethan[/name_m], Oliver

Looking forward to seeing you suggestions for first/middles/combos! Thanks ever so much, in advance.

[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Tennyson[/name_m]
[name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] [name_m]David[/name_m]
[name_m]Gideon[/name_m] [name_m]Charles[/name_m]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m]
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Charles[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]

[name_m]Charles[/name_m] - what do you think of using [name_m]Charles[/name_m] as a first, then you’d have A, B, C–which is sorta cute and subtle
[name_m]Christopher[/name_m] or [name_m]Caleb[/name_m] could also work for that

We wanted to avoid the A, B, C thing, though I agree it’s subtle (people keep making jokes about A&B as it is – and that combo was coincidental). [name_m]Charles[/name_m] is the name of my late grandfather, but my husband is not keen on it as a first name (I like it, but he has a bad association with a [name_m]Charles[/name_m]/[name_m]Chuck[/name_m]).

I really like [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m], [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Tennyson[/name_m], [name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] [name_m]David[/name_m], [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u] and [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m]. Thank you!

I love so many on your list!

[name_m]Thomas[/name_m]
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m]

With [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m], I think the names below are fine. I would eliminate names ending in “n” like [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] ([name_m]Gideon[/name_m], [name_m]Jonathan[/name_m], [name_m]Dawson[/name_m]) and names ending in “s” like your surname ([name_m]Thomas[/name_m]). My favourite is [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] nn [name_m]Timo[/name_m] (tee-moh). I love [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] but he would share an initial with [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] so it’s not ideal.

[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Night[/name_m]
[name_m]Gabriel[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]

My two favorites:

[name_m]Samuel David[/name_m]
[name_m]Thomas Reid[/name_m] **[name_m]Thomas[/name_m]'s meaning “the twin” doesn’t bother me at all.

[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]David[/name_m] or [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m] would be a great match.

I like [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] and [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] best of your list with your other boys’ names. I echo the previous commenter that you might want to avoid matching initials (personal preference, might not bother you) and names ending in the -en/-in sound to avoid confusion with [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] when yelling across the yard.

I like:

[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Charles[/name_m]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]

I like your names!

I like the suggestions of :
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]
[name_m]Caleb[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]

[name_m]Caleb[/name_m] [name_m]Timothy[/name_m]
[name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]

Strong, classic names. My favourites would be [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], [name_m]Thomas[/name_m]. As alternatives to [name_m]Thomas[/name_m], perhaps you could consider [name_m]Tobin[/name_m] or [name_m]Tobias[/name_m].

My suggestions:
[name_m]Daniel[/name_m]
[name_m]Alec[/name_m]
[name_m]Frederick[/name_m]
[name_m]Broderick[/name_m]
[name_m]Benedict[/name_m]
[name_m]Burke[/name_m]
[name_u]Lorne[/name_u]
[name_m]Arthur[/name_m]
[name_m]Christopher[/name_m]
[name_m]Conrad[/name_m]
[name_m]Garrett[/name_m]/[name_m]Garrit[/name_m]
[name_m]Hendrick[/name_m]
[name_m]Richard[/name_m]

I vote for [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]. I like how using [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] would give each boy a different main vowel sound in the first accented syllable -while all the names would match in style/category. [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] has the prominent short A vowel sound; [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] has the short E sound, and [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] highlights the short I sound. I enjoy this feature of my kids names. For that reason, I would pass on [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] (first syllable too similar to the first syllable in [name_m]Andrew[/name_m]) even though [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] is a super handsome name.

Congratulations! Three boys, how sweet. :slight_smile:

[name_m]Alexander[/name_m] ([name_u]Alex[/name_u] or [name_m]Xan[/name_m] as nns) — Agree with pp that having another A name (while leaving brother [name_m]Ben[/name_m] out of the trend) isn’t the best idea. [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] and [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] are rather similar.
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] ([name_u]Jay[/name_u] or [name_m]Jake[/name_m] as nns)— Did you mean to write “[name_m]Jacob[/name_m]” here? Not seeing how [name_u]Jay[/name_u] or [name_m]Jake[/name_m] would be a nickname for [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]. But I think [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] works well in this set. “[name_u]Joey[/name_u]” is always an adorable nn. [name_m]Jacob[/name_m] is too popular for my taste.
[name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] — I really am not a fan. It’s so generic.
[name_u]Michael[/name_u] — Ditto above. Unless it has special meaning or significance to you.
[name_m]Gideon[/name_m] — Agree that -n names aren’t going to be the best fit with the set. This has the same number of syllables as [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m], too.
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] — I like this! [name_m]Andrew[/name_m], [name_m]Ben[/name_m], and [name_u]Sam[/name_u]. Very cute.
[name_m]Dawson[/name_m] (not as “classic”, but we both really like it and it sounds good with the last name)— Nah, it’s following a much different path than the other two.
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] — Not a huge fan of [name_m]Timothy[/name_m]. “[name_m]Tim[/name_m]” just sounds wimpy to my ear.
[name_m]Gabriel[/name_m] (I really like this name; hubby not so much) — I really like this, as well! Too bad hubs isn’t quite on board. I think it would be great with this sibset.
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] (though it might be weird to have the one non-twin named “the twin”, no?) — I don’t think anyone would know/notice/care about the meaning, but I’m just not a fan of [name_m]Thomas[/name_m]. The nickname possibilities aren’t appealing to me at all, and the full name isn’t either.

Middle names (none of these can be used as first names, for various reasons):

[name_m]David[/name_m]— Sure. Strong classic.
[name_m]Henry[/name_m]— Classic yet with a vintage charm.
[name_m]Charles[/name_m]— Sure.
[name_m]Gordon[/name_m] (these first 4 are all family names, but we aren’t stuck on using a family name for the middle)— [name_m]Gordon[/name_m] isn’t nearly as cool as [name_m]Robert[/name_m] or [name_u]Ryan[/name_u]. I’d go with one from the previous three if you’re to choose a family name.
[name_u]James[/name_u]— Seems to work well with just about any first name.
[name_m]Night[/name_m]— No. It’s too late to go with an eccentric name, even in the middle spot, after the classics you gave your first sons.
[name_m]Shepherd[/name_m]— Ditto above.
[name_u]Reid[/name_u]— I like this, plus it follows the “R” theme for a middle name, matching your other two.
[name_m]Remington[/name_m]— Too much.
[name_m]Tennyson[/name_m] (these last two might be too long with the last name?)— No. Now is not the time to start getting trendy.

I would go with, based off your list, any of these:

[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]David[/name_m]
[name_m]Gabriel[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]

i like [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] and [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] ( which is my sons name) but I can’t imagine [name_m]Jake[/name_m] as a nn for [name_m]Joseph[/name_m]!
What’s wrong with [name_m]Joe[/name_m]? I think [name_m]Andrew[/name_m], [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] ([name_m]Ben[/name_m]) and [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] ([name_m]Joe[/name_m]) Is a great combo! [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] is nice too!

Thank you all so much for your wonderful suggestions! I knew I could count on you for ideas, comments, and points we hadn’t thought of.

I’m at work and can’t respond to everyone individually, but generally wanted to say that our top contenders for first names now are [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] and [name_m]Thomas[/name_m], with [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] still in the running. I still really like [name_m]Gabriel[/name_m], but can’t convert hubby, and he has also now decided that he’s not keen on [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] (which is too bad, since I think [name_m]Andrew[/name_m], [name_m]Ben[/name_m] and [name_u]Sam[/name_u] is a very cute sibset).

We aren’t bothered by [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] sharing the same first initial. We know quite a few people who have more than 2 kids, and have 2 or more of their kids (but not all) sharing a first initial and it doesn’t seem to be an issue. I doubt [name_m]Ben[/name_m] will feel left out; if anything, I worry more that this third little guy will feel left out since he won’t share their twin bond. [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] would be a meaningful choice for us, since my husband’s family has a long line of [name_m]Albert[/name_m]'s, and I see it as a fresher, more classic version of “[name_m]Al[/name_m]”, and my mother is [name_u]Allison[/name_u], so again the same first two letters.

For [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], I agree that nickname [name_m]Jake[/name_m] is a stretch, but we would definitely use [name_u]Jay[/name_u]. I’ve seen [name_u]Jay[/name_u] as a nickname for a variety of “J” names, including [name_m]John[/name_m] and [name_m]Johann[/name_m]. We also know a [name_m]Karl[/name_m] who goes by [name_u]Jay[/name_u] (and not a middle or anything, just a nickname). I don’t mind [name_u]Joey[/name_u]/[name_m]Joe[/name_m], but [name_u]Jay[/name_u] honours my husband’s best friend, who will likely be this baby’s godfather. Also, hubby has a cousin named [name_u]Joey[/name_u]/[name_m]Joe[/name_m], and although the last name is different, it might be odd. I’m not keen on [name_m]Jacob[/name_m], as it is very popular where we live.

For [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] I don’t mind that both first and last names end in -s. Because the last name is 3 syllables, it doesn’t “hiss” when said aloud. Also, many Lithuanian last names end in -s, and a lot of the masculine first names end in -s or -as, so it’s kind of a traditional combination. I’m still a bit bothered by [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] meaning “the twin”, but it’s true that not many people would think of that. We chose [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m], in part, due to their meanings, though, so it is a consideration for us.

I do really like [name_m]Timothy[/name_m], and adore the suggestion for the nickname [name_m]Timo[/name_m]. It is staying on our list, but hubby likes the other 3 names better, I think. Maybe [name_m]Timo[/name_m] would work as a dimunitive nickname for [name_m]Thomas[/name_m], instead of [name_m]Tommy[/name_m]?

Now that it’s been mentioned, we also see [name_u]Michael[/name_u] as maybe being more of an 80s/90s name. We’ve decided that it, and [name_m]Jonathan[/name_m] (which I agree is kind of plain), are out.

I liked some of the suggested classics, particularly [name_m]Dominic[/name_m] and [name_m]Tobias[/name_m], but can’t sell hubby on anything off our list (at least, at the moment).

I really like the following suggested combinations:

[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Remington[/name_m]
[name_m]Thomas[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]
[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]

I like [name_u]Reid[/name_u] or [name_u]James[/name_u] with [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], since I think a long first name sounds better with a short middle.

One issue is that [name_m]Henry[/name_m] is my husband’s father’s middle name (and he goes by [name_m]Henry[/name_m]), and if we use that we might also have to use [name_m]David[/name_m] or [name_m]Gordon[/name_m] (my dad’s first/middle), so nobody is offended – and I’m not sure I want two middles, although [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] [name_m]Henry[/name_m] [name_m]Gordon[/name_m] doesn’t sound too bad.

We’d also thought about keeping “R” names in the middle, as a way to connect all three boys. That’s how [name_u]Reid[/name_u] and [name_m]Remington[/name_m] got on the list; unfortunately, I’m not fond of [name_m]Richard[/name_m], [name_m]Ronald[/name_m], [name_m]Roland[/name_m] or other classic “R” names, and we have no other family “R” names. [name_m]Robert[/name_m] is my brother’s name and [name_u]Ryan[/name_u] is the last name of a brilliant surgeon who saved our boys’ lives by performing intrauterine surgery at 21 weeks to stop the progress of a condition called twin twin transfusion syndrome. I would love another meaningful middle, but do like the idea of another “R” name. Hmmm.

Would love to hear any other suggestions, or suggestions for other “R” names that might work with [name_m]Joseph[/name_m], [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] or [name_m]Timothy[/name_m]!

[name_m]Timothy[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u] is my favorite of all the options here. [name_m]Timo[/name_m] is a great nickname. I like that [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] shares the style of [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] but has different sounds. In terms of finding a meaningful middle but not excluding anyone, would DH’s name work as a middle for this baby?

His name is [name_m]Peter[/name_m], and we just talked about that this morning! Not sure it would work so well with [name_m]Timothy[/name_m] or [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], as that would get too long with a 3-syllable last name, but with [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] or [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] it could be quite nice, perhaps?

My first choice for you would have been [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u]! (I like keeping all the middle names starting with R) but now that you have crossed it off your list I definitely think [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]Reid[/name_u] is the one!
[name_m]Alexander[/name_m] has so many nickname options and is a classic name like [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m]. I don’t think it is too similar to [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] and normally I wouldn’t suggest sharing an initial but in this case it might help him to feel less left out being the younger non-twin if he shares an initial with one of his older brothers :wink:

lk86-- I have to admit that I am also starting to think that [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] is the one. I like the idea of keeping the “R” middle, but if we have a middle with no personal meaning (like [name_u]Reid[/name_u]), I like that [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] can be tied to family names. I’d also thought of the same thing you did, that having the same initials as [name_m]Andrew[/name_m] might let this little guy feel more part of the group. I really do not think [name_m]Benjamin[/name_m] will care, since we have a neat story behind both his first and middle names and how he became the twin to receive these names.

My husband is not as keen on [name_m]Alexander[/name_m], but does like it. I think his concern is that I have a cousin who has a son named [name_m]Alexander[/name_m]. I don’t think it’s a big deal (and I’ll mention it to my cousin beforehand to see what he thinks; doubt he’ll care at all). My counsin’s two boys and our three are the only kids on this side of the family. However, they would have different last names (my cousin and I don’t even share a last name, much less my husband and my cousin!), and their little guy goes solely by [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] (no nickname), whereas our little one will go by [name_u]Alex[/name_u] or maybe [name_m]Xan[/name_m]/[name_m]Xander[/name_m] (I prefer [name_u]Alex[/name_u], but we’ll see). We see them maybe once a year, and neither my cousin nor his wife are the type of people who’d get miffed by something like this. Does anyone think this is something to worry about?

A nn is just that, it doesn’t really need to come from the name or be a short-form of the name - it could be because your child reminds you of someone or because you want to unofficially recognize a friend. I think [name_u]Jay[/name_u] for [name_m]Joseph[/name_m] is 100% ok. Of your names [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] probably has the best options for nn’s that come from the name - [name_u]Alex[/name_u], [name_u]Lex[/name_u], [name_u]Andy[/name_u], X, [name_m]Xan[/name_m], [name_m]Xander[/name_m]/[name_u]Sander[/name_u], [name_m]Al[/name_m], [name_m]Alec[/name_m]…

Depending on your cousin, having the same name as his son may or may not be an issue, but it sounds like it would be fine in this instance. I’d probably ask just in case.

[name_f]Do[/name_f] you see this cousin and his son [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] on a regular basis? If so, I think it would be a little weird, and you would probably get other people in your family asking about/wondering why you used the same name.

But if it’s a relative you rarely ever see, aren’t close with, and lives far away or something, it wouldn’t be as big of a deal.