[name_f]Susan[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]
Very midcentury. Fewer frills than [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] or [name_f]Lily[/name_f]. Still dated but would be refreshing on a youngin.
[name_f]Susan[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]
Very midcentury. Fewer frills than [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] or [name_f]Lily[/name_f]. Still dated but would be refreshing on a youngin.
[name_f]Claire[/name_f]
[name_f]Chelsea[/name_f]
[name_m]Samson[/name_m]
@Huckfinn I love when someone can make me totally rethink a name!! Now I’m actually thinking [name_f]Susan[/name_f] could be so darn cute on a sweet little girl
[name_f]Edwige[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Ginger[/name_f]
[name_f]Ann[/name_f] / [name_f]Anne[/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]It’s kind of aggressively plain and I kind of love that. The french spelling (Anne) packs as much frill as you can into such a slight name, and the english spelling (Ann) is prim and no nonsense. Yes I’m in my boring name era.
I love both!
[name_f]Anne[/name_f] is starting to sound cool again, in my opinion. I think we have had a preference for [name_f]Anna[/name_f] for a while, so it’s Ann/Anne’s turn to be in the spotlight.
[name_f]Rayna[/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]‘Queen’
[name_f]Hathaway[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Henrietta[/name_f]
[name_m]Jovan[/name_m]
[name_f]Jacinda[/name_f]
[name_m]Bryn[/name_m] (b)
[name_m]Hemingway[/name_m] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]
[name_f]Patricia[/name_f]
[name_f]Coralie[/name_f]
ziggy
[name_f]Winifred[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]
[name_f][/name_f]