I love matching twin names as long as they’re not too matchy matchy (e.g. [name_u]Michael[/name_u] and [name_f]Michaela[/name_f], or names that just sound really similar like [name_f]Emma[/name_f] and [name_f]Bella[/name_f] as examples); but I really like the idea of floral names for twins or names starting with the same letter!
I’m not a huge fan of nature names for boys like [name_u]Fox[/name_u] which seem to be popular on here. I love a lot of girl’s nature names but most of the boys ones have never really cut it for me. I also don’t like [name_m]Dashiell[/name_m], [name_m]Bodhi[/name_m], [name_u]Bennett[/name_u], [name_u]Ash[/name_u]/er, [name_f]Florence[/name_f], [name_f]Daphne[/name_f], [name_f]Frances[/name_f], [name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Claire[/name_f], [name_m]Edward[/name_m], [name_f]Willa[/name_f]/[name_f]Wilhelmina[/name_f], [name_m]Conrad[/name_m] and [name_u]August[/name_u] which seem to get a lot of positive mentions on Nameberry.
Popularity also doesn’t bother me much. I’m in the if you love it, use it camp and think it’s a shame when people go so far as to avoid the top 50 or even top 100 - I think we need to think about it realistically for our respective areas as a name that’s on the national list may not be as popular where you live locally, or vice versa. There are only a few names where I think “oh, another one” ([name_m]Jack[/name_m] and [name_f]Emma[/name_f] are the two I can think of).