Updated list 12/17- Thoughts?

Hello! I’ve updated my list a bit and was looking for thoughts/ opinions/ suggestions. I will keep the old list in my signature for reference. Thanks!

[name_m]New[/name_m] list:

[name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] | [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] | [name_f]Jillian[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] | [name_f]Vera[/name_f] [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]

[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Clark[/name_m] | [name_u]Arden[/name_u] [name_m]Isaiah[/name_m] | [name_m]Paul[/name_m] [name_m]Victor[/name_m] | [name_m]Silas[/name_m] [name_m]William[/name_m]

I really like the sound of [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f], it sounds really pretty with [name_f]Rose[/name_f]. [name_f]Diana[/name_f] is a hard name to match with, I met someone else having trouble with that name as a middle name. If its a honor name, I do say keep it. It’s different and [name_f]Rose[/name_f] can be seen as just a filler middle name, but I find it beautiful.

[name_f]Vera[/name_f] [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]. [name_f]Vera[/name_f] is so beautiful, and [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f] is a nice name and I think they go nicely together

[name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u]- I love [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] a lot. [name_f]Cora[/name_f] isn’t my taste, but they go together nicely.

[name_f]Jillian[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f]- This would be the only one that I don’t think flows as nicely as the others.

[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Clark[/name_m]- [name_u]Love[/name_u] this. I’m crushing on [name_m]Clark[/name_m] lately.
[name_u]Arden[/name_u] [name_m]Isaiah[/name_m]- I love these names separately but im not so sure if I like the flow as much as your others.
[name_m]Paul[/name_m] [name_m]Victor[/name_m]- Nice Strong manly names. Classics, love
[name_m]Silas[/name_m] [name_m]William[/name_m]- they flow together nicely. [name_m]Silas[/name_m] is not my style, though but they still flow great. Strong name.

I love all of your new names, except for [name_f]Jillian[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], which doesn’t flow as well. [name_f]Elowen[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], maybe? From your old list, the only one I would keep that you haven’t is [name_m]Soren[/name_m] [name_m]Thomas[/name_m].

I like [name_f]Vera[/name_f] [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f] and [name_f]Jillian[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], although I would prefer proper [name_f]Isabella[/name_f] more than [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]. I find boy list OK, just not my style.

[name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_u]Eloise[/name_u]: very pretty, even though I don’t like [name_u]Eloise[/name_u] in its own right. For that reason, I would probably prefer a slight variation, e.g. [name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_f]Louise[/name_f] or [name_f]Cora[/name_f] [name_f]Ellen[/name_f].

[name_f]Imogen[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]: beautiful. I usually find [name_f]Rose[/name_f] quite dull as a mn, but I think it’s lovely with [name_f]Imogen[/name_f].

[name_f]Jillian[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f]: I really like [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], and really dislike [name_f]Jillian[/name_f]. I don’t think they work together at all well either - too many short peppy “i” sounds and too many syllables. I would reinstate a name from your old list to go with [name_f]Olivia[/name_f], e.g. [name_f]Margaux[/name_f] [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] or [name_f]Olivia[/name_f] [name_f]Nell[/name_f]. [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] both of these!

[name_f]Vera[/name_f] [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]: lovely. Great to see [name_f]Vera[/name_f] getting some use! I personally prefer the spelling [name_f]Isabel[/name_f] or [name_f]Isobel[/name_f], but regardless this combo works very well.

[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_m]Clark[/name_m]: sounds good. I don’t like [name_m]Clark[/name_m] but the flow is nice. I preferred your old combo of [name_u]Beau[/name_u] [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] though.

[name_u]Arden[/name_u] [name_m]Isaiah[/name_m]: I see [name_u]Arden[/name_u] as a girl’s name primarily, but the flow of this combo is beautiful. I would prefer [name_m]Soren[/name_m] [name_m]Isaiah[/name_m] just because I prefer the name [name_m]Soren[/name_m]. I agree with the pp about reinstating [name_m]Soren[/name_m] [name_m]Thomas[/name_m] - that’s a beautiful combo!

[name_m]Paul[/name_m] [name_m]Victor[/name_m]: I find [name_m]Paul[/name_m] dull and [name_m]Victor[/name_m] is nms, so I don’t really like this. However, that’s just personal taste. I do think [name_m]Paul[/name_m] [name_m]Vincent[/name_m] has a better, crisper sound.

[name_m]Silas[/name_m] [name_m]William[/name_m]: I see this is the only one that you haven’t changed, and it works really well so I can see why. I think the two names complement each other and have a really nice flow.