Respondents: 86 (This poll is closed)
[name]Catherine[/name] nn [name]Kit[/name], [name]London[/name] as a middle name!
I love the sound of [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] but I really love the name [name]Kit[/name] (short for [name]Catherine[/name]) so I voted for that. [name]Kit[/name] and [name]Stanton[/name] would be very cute!
[name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] (mn [name]Elizabeth[/name]) seems like a confident, strong yet compassionate young lady… I love [name]Kit[/name] over [name]Catherine[/name]!
I like [name]Catherine[/name] but I love [name]Kit[/name]! I do love [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] as well though… Who suits [name]Stanton[/name] more?
I voted [name]Catherine[/name] because of the nickname [name]Kit[/name]
I voted for [name]Catherine[/name] because I [name]LOVE[/name] when people use the less frequent nicknames for it (like [name]Kit[/name]). But then I realized [name]Catherine[/name] and [name]Stanton[/name] kind of rhyme … now I’m thinking I like [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] better. [name]Stanton[/name] and [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] would be so cute together!!
My name is [name]Katherine[/name] and I have always been called [name]Katy[/name] - even when i tried to go by other things I’ve always been called [name]Katy[/name]
I voted for [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name]
As Babybell stated, [name]Catherine[/name]/[name]Katherine[/name] has so many nicknames that I fear other people will call almost anything. I love [name]Kit[/name] or [name]Catherine[/name]. That is why I keep leaning toward a double first name for her [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] or [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name]???
Are double names strong professional female names? What first impression would you have when you see this name on an application?
[name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] Czajkowski
[name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] Czajkowski
[name]Catherine[/name] Czajkowski
I still love [name]Catherine[/name] [name]London[/name] for you- I think it’s the most professional name combo on your list. I think that if you want her to go by [name]Kit[/name] you should make it clear while she’s still young. [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] are alright, but they don’t have the same timeless yet interesting feel that [name]Catherine[/name] does. [name]Olivia[/name] is very popular (I think it’s in the top ten) and [name]Jane[/name] is intersting, but I don’t like it with [name]Stanton[/name].
I hope that helps. Good luck with your desicion!
Yes aj_bear, it does help. Thank you! The only other classic name that we agreed on was [name]Constance[/name] with nm [name]Kit[/name].
Perhaps my short list should be
[name]Constance[/name] (mn [name]London[/name])
[name]Catherine[/name] (mn [name]London[/name])
[name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] (mn. [name]Elizabeth[/name])
[name]Olivia[/name] [name]London[/name] (mn [name]Elizabeth[/name])
I do like gender neutral name: [name]Hollis[/name], [name]Collins[/name], [name]Sinclair[/name], [name]Pearson[/name] etc but all have been vetoed. What is a woman to do? The baby is due any day now and she is without a name unless it is a boy. His name will be either [name]Pierce[/name] [name]Maxwell[/name], [name]Pierce[/name] [name]Calloway[/name] or [name]Reid[/name] [name]Patrick[/name]. Boy names are easier for me!
aj_bear is right in my heart I think about [name]Catherine[/name] (nn [name]Kit[/name]) being the most professional name as she grows. However, I do love the uniqueness of [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] which is why I keep coming back to them. My husband has excluded all other names at this point and focused on these. If you were to look at her application or Cv which first impressions would you have of each of these 3 women?
I even love [name]Pearson[/name] and [name]Sinclair[/name]. They are as strong as [name]Stanton[/name] and unique ; however, my husband excluded them because they are unisex!
My name is [name]Catherine[/name] and I always went by [name]Catherine[/name], except when I went through a phase when I wanted to be called [name]Cathy[/name] (which people did, despite the stupidity, because I asked them to). I really don’t get how people don’t have control over their name. I’ve been in complete control my whole life, and I’m not even an aggressive or forward person – I’m very shy and somehow still retained control.
As for professional, I don’t think [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] (which grew on me fast and now I [name]LOVE[/name] as a double name) is any less professional than [name]Catherine[/name] at all. [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] I just can’t buy as a double name. I feel like she would just end up being [name]Jane[/name], or JL. Maybe because it’s a little clunky. But [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] is so easy to say and so lovely and just makes you smile to say it. I see absolutely nothing unprofessional or less professional about it. Besides, she’s going to be in a work force with Jaydens, McKynzees, and the like, so she’ll be super professional compared to them. 
[name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] [name]Elizabeth[/name] gets my vote. I do like [name]Ann[/name] [name]London[/name], but [name]StANton[/name] and [name]ANN[/name] [name]London[/name] is a deal breaker for me.
I voted [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name], but only because I just can’t not vote for [name]Olivia[/name] when it’s placed before me! Despite the popularity, I absolutely love her, and I think [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] is a great combo. It’s pretty much killing me not to vote for [name]Catherine[/name] nn [name]Kit[/name] (which I love). I even really love [name]Ann[/name] [name]London[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] as double names, and even the nns [name]Annie[/name] and [name]Janie[/name].
I think [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name], [name]Catherine[/name] “[name]Kit[/name]”, [name]Ann[/name] [name]London[/name], and [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] would be my order of preference, but I absolutely love them all, I don’t think you could go wrong with a single one.
Good luck!
Does [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] flow well together? I thought it did due to the “n” in [name]Jane[/name] and [name]London[/name]. I think you just don’t hear it at all which is why perhaps it sounds awkward to your ears. I have to keep saying it to myself. I do love [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] and I feel that one does flow well together. That is such a great point that [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] is easy to say! .I love the nn [name]Kit[/name] but I only like [name]Catherine[/name].
I agree that [name]Ann[/name] [name]London[/name] and [name]StANton[/name] are too close. I hadn’t considered that one before.
This is so difficult! [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] vs [name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name]. Is [name]Olivia[/name] too popular?
I welcome all suggestions still at this point! I’m am very open to new ideas that would compliment [name]Stanton[/name]'s name! I love [name]Catherine[/name] [name]London[/name] too but I have heard [name]Catherine[/name] or a derivative my entire life which makes me almost immune to it in comparison to [name]Stanton[/name]'s name. It’s classic and timeless but not unique. I have a [name]Kate[/name] and [name]Kaitlyn[/name] living right beside me as it is!
That is what has brought us to double names. I love unisex names such as [name]Calloway[/name], [name]Pearson[/name] and [name]Sinclair[/name] for a girl and he does not. We can only agree on double names it appears. But, if that is the case which one is more professional and strong? My instinct says [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] only because [name]Jane[/name] is such a strong, beautiful and under used name. We could use [name]Jane[/name] as the first name, [name]London[/name] as the middle instead of as a double first name. What other combinations can you think of that would compliment [name]Stanton[/name]?
[name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] (mn [name]Elizabeth[/name])
[name]Jane[/name] (mn [name]London[/name])
[name]Olivia[/name] [name]Jane[/name] (beautiful but [name]Olivia[/name] is very popular)
Perhaps there is another combination that would work better?
[name]Olivia[/name] is beautiful though! [name]Jane[/name] [name]London[/name] appears stronger?