I love all of your names and think they would all go really well with [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. My favorites are [name_m]Arthur[/name_m], [name_m]Louis[/name_m], and [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]. I also think [name_m]Leo[/name_m] would make a great sibling name to [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. You could also use a longer form of [name_m]Leo[/name_m] such as [name_m]Leopold[/name_m] or [name_m]Leonardo[/name_m] to get to the name [name_m]Leo[/name_m], but I think it works well on its own. Honestly, you can’t go wrong. You have a great list of names and I could imagine all of them as siblings to [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. Congratulations and best wishes.
Also, [name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] is an absolutely beautiful combination.
I was going to comment the same thing!!! As much as I love classic names, [name_m]Henry[/name_m] and [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] are so popular and it’s really refreshing to see [name_m]Frederick[/name_m]. It’s substantial, royal, saintly, strong, and not too common!
[name_m]Frederick[/name_m] gets my vote, followed by [name_m]Edward[/name_m] and [name_m]Oscar[/name_m] (which my signature shows my bias for.)
It’s funny that you should say so! I guess it just depends on where in the US you live. I live in the Northern Midwest and I have not met a single little boy by the name of [name_m]Henry[/name_m] or [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] so they do seem like fresh classics here. And I actually do know a little boy (age 5) named [name_m]Frederick[/name_m]. So [name_m]Frederick[/name_m] does not seem overused by any means. I just have not found it to be as rare as [name_m]Theodore[/name_m]. Very interesting…
I like [name_m]Edward[/name_m], [name_m]Frederick[/name_m], and [name_m]Henry[/name_m] the best. Also I want to suggest [name_u]Morgan[/name_u]. Not sure why but I thought of the pairing once and liked it.
