While I generally like the names, [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] seems a little out of place to me-- it’s much more elaborate or dramatic sounding than [name_f]Flora[/name_f] or [name_f]Gemma[/name_f]. What about moving it to the mn position? Maybe [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f], [name_f]Lucy[/name_f] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f], [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f], [name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f], or even [name_f]Clara[/name_f] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] (if you want to stick with the -A ending)?
I’d reverse to end up w/[name_f]Clementine[/name_f] [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f], [name_f]Juliette[/name_f] [name_f]Flora[/name_f], [name_u]August[/name_u] [name_u]Elliott[/name_u] and keep [name_f]Gemma[/name_f] [name_f]Rosalie[/name_f].
@davisellu
While I love the name [name_f]Clara[/name_f], the repeated ending -ra somehow bugs me. I just adore the name [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] and when I looked up the stats ([name_f]England[/name_f] / [name_m]Wales[/name_m] 2011) I was surprised to find that [name_f]Flora[/name_f] and [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] share the same rank (400+ / 108 births). I thought that [name_f]Flora[/name_f], while unpopular, would be higher than [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] (due to the dramatic association).
[name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] would definitely fit in with more elaborate names, the problem here: I’m not a big fan of most (except [name_f]Ophelia[/name_f] obviously).
Also I’m nowhere near having kids, I just like to come up with names and these are my favourites at the moment