of course I am only dreaming right now. we do have our [name]Evan[/name], and are expecting another baby in [name]March[/name] (don’t know gender yet), but dream of having many, many children:-)
I like your girl names a lot - [name]Lucy[/name]/[name]Lucia[/name], [name]Stella[/name], and [name]Clara[/name] especially. I also like [name]Sylvie[/name], but don’t like the repeating “S” with [name]Stella[/name] if you’re looking at a sibset
.
Your boy names aren’t as much my style, but [name]Davis[/name] and [name]Evan[/name] together are nice. [name]Jackson[/name] is fine, too, but I don’t like [name]Connor[/name].
I think [name]Lucy[/name], [name]Stella[/name], [name]Clara[/name], and [name]Sylvie[/name] would go better with more vintage boy names. The boy names and girl names you have seem to be from different eras (though at least they are consistent within the boy and girl groupings).
The only middle combo I don’t like is [name]Rachel[/name] with [name]Sylvie[/name]. It doesn’t have great flow. The other middle name combos sound nice to me.
As a mother of eight children I love that you’re dreaming of so many babies.
[name]Evan[/name] [name]James[/name] is beyond handsome. I love it. I think [name]Lucy[/name], [name]Stella[/name], and [name]Clare[/name] all work really well as sisters while [name]Sylvie[/name] sticks out as an old-lady name. [name]Sylvie[/name] [name]Rachel[/name] just pales in comparison to the stunning names you’ve chosen for the three other girls. [name]Evan[/name], [name]Davis[/name], [name]Jackson[/name], and [name]Conner[/name] are all nice. I prefer the [name]Connor[/name] spelling, but that’s just personal preference. I think they all go together besides [name]Sylvie[/name] and [name]Jackson[/name]. That’s an odd mix of old-lady and super trendy.
I have to disagree with the pp. I think [name]Lucy[/name], [name]Stella[/name], [name]Clara[/name] and [name]Sylvie[/name] all work beautifully as sisters. Although the first three may be more trendy now, they all have a history. There could be little old ladies named [name]Lucy[/name], [name]Stella[/name] and [name]Clara[/name], as easily as a [name]Sylvie[/name].
To me the odd name out is [name]Jackson[/name], and to lesser degree [name]Davis[/name]. Instead of these surnames as given names, I’d rather see something leaning toward the Celtic like [name]Evan[/name], [name]Connor[/name], [name]Owen[/name] and [name]Kyle[/name].
I love those names as a sibling set! I agree that [name]Jackson[/name] does seem like the odd name out though.
I come from a big family and plan on having a big family myself, it’s good to know I’m not the only one
