Alright so these names are my guilty pleasures and I absolutely adore them although I think they are a bit unpractical. I have a dream guilty pleasure subset and I want to know what you think of it. Whether it might actually be usable or am I type casting them with edgy and too cool names??
They’d be totally wearable in my ‘hood. We’re in [name]Metro[/name] DC, and kids have all sorts of names. [name]Do[/name] they work together? I’m less sure about that. [name]Knox[/name] and [name]Cash[/name] sound like brothers, but [name]Alton[/name] feels preppier while [name]Knox[/name] and [name]Cash[/name] are cowboys. [name]Nola[/name] is sassy and feminine, but I think [name]Garnett[/name] would feel like a boys’ name in this set. In another grouping, I would love [name]Garnet[/name]/t on a girl. And I’d even love [name]Nola[/name] [name]Garnett[/name] as a combination.
abby- I agree with what you said about [name]Alton[/name] vs. [name]Knox[/name] and [name]Cash[/name]. [name]Alton[/name] is much preppier I think. Would [name]Knox[/name], [name]Nola[/name] and [name]Cash[/name] work? What could [name]Garnett[/name] work with subset wise?
[name]Nola[/name] and [name]Knox[/name] are fine and perfectly usable [name]IMO[/name].
I don’t see anything particularly wrong with [name]Garnett[/name] or [name]Alton[/name] either, they just aren’t my style. [name]Garnett[/name] sounds very harsh for a little girl, especially as [name]Nola[/name] is so soft sounding.
[name]Cash[/name] is the only one I really don’t like, I just think of money. [name]Cassius[/name] would be better.
