Emma Caroline?
Opinions would be appreciated. Be honest. Thank you!
It’s nothing special. [name]Both[/name] of them are classic names, but I prefer [name]Caroline[/name].
Yes, [name]Emma[/name] is so very popular, but still gorgeous to me.
I think [name]Caroline[/name] in the middle gives it an all around classic feel.
[name]Love[/name] it. Definitely go for it!
Good choice!
[name]Emma[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] is a very pretty name and is classic. [name]Emma[/name] is currently a very popular name, so as long as you are fine with that I would go with it!
[name]Just[/name] beautiful! It it were me, however, I would be a little worried about popularity. So sad that a name as lovely as [name]Emma[/name] is so overused! If you love it that much not to care, by all means, go for it, but just be prepared for her to be an [name]Emma[/name] B., [name]Emma[/name] R. etc. (meaning she would be one of at least a few in her class, most likely)
[name]Caroline[/name] is a wonderful classic that I like very much, as either a first name or middle name 
[name]Elsa[/name], [name]Etta[/name], or [name]Emmeline[/name] would be some similar, but less popular, alternatives.
Best of luck!!
A little late for this, but, I felt I should say that I am NOT pregnant. [name]Just[/name] dreaming of my future kids’ names. The more opinions, the better. Keep 'em coming!
Also, if she had a sister, her name would be [name]Aubree[/name] [name]Jane[/name]. [name]How[/name] do these names sound as a sib-set?
Classy and beautiful!
I don’t really like [name]Emma[/name] at all. [name]Just[/name] Meh, in my opinion. [name]Caroline[/name] is nicer, but still not anything special or interesting.
I would spell [name]Aubree[/name] as [name]Aubrey[/name] first of all. And I would put [name]Jane[/name] in the first position, because I like [name]Jane[/name] so much more than [name]Aubrey[/name].
[name]Jane[/name] is just beautiful.
It is okay. It bores me a bit. [name]Emmeline[/name] [name]Charlotte[/name] (even though I dislike [name]Charlotte[/name]) would be a more interesting pick, imo.
I think it is beautiful! [name]Emma[/name] is popular, but very sweet and classic.
A bit dull but certainly gorgeous. I can’t really criticise as my top name choice at the moment is pretty boring. ([name]May[/name] [name]Beth[/name]).
[name]Aubrey[/name] [name]Jane[/name] is much more interesting to me. I’m not feeling the double e spelling, though.
It’s sweet but a little boring.
[name]Aubrey[/name] is a nice name ( spelled like this). I’m burned out on [name]Emma[/name]'s as a teacher having to say [name]Emma[/name] L., [name]Emma[/name] S. etc, do many lids named [name]Jacob[/name] and [name]Emma[/name]!
[name]Emma[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] and [name]Aubree[/name] [name]Jane[/name] are beautiful names! I happen to like the [name]Aubrey[/name] spelling better.
It’s on the plain side, but honestly I see nothing wrong with that. A plain name won’t make a plain child. [name]Caroline[/name] is simply stunning and class and I would love to see it in the fn spot instead of [name]Emma[/name].
[name]Emma[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] and [name]Aubree[/name] [name]Jane[/name] don’t sound perfect to me, but not bad. I would pair [name]Emma[/name] with something a little more classic, yet popular. [name]Caroline[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] work well together though!
I think [name]Emma[/name] [name]Caroline[/name] is cute. I don’t worry about how popular a name is. If that name fits your child then don’t settle just to have a uncommon name.