My favourites are [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] and [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m], I think they both work really well. I used to have [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Lewis[/name_m] on my list and I love it
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - I like the [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] part but I don’t like the name [name_f]Hazel[/name_f].
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] - This does not have the best flow! [name_m]How[/name_m] about [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]?
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - I really like the name [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] but not a fan of [name_f]Violet[/name_f]! Sorry.
[name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - I would not suggest [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] as a full name! [name_m]How[/name_m] about using it as a nickname for [name_f]Winona[/name_f] or [name_f]Winifred[/name_f]?
I think [name_f]Winona[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] sounds lovely.
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m] - It’s a bit of an odd pairing!
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] - I don’t like the name [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] but [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] is okay.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m] - This is nice.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m] - I like this.
My favorites are [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] & [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u]. I don’t like [name_f]Violet[/name_f] b/c it reminds me of violent both in sound and sight, but [name_f]Viola[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] is pretty to me. [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] is adorable but for a real person I would recommend a full name instead of [name_f]Winnie[/name_f]. [name_f]Winifred[/name_f] is cute, [name_f]Gwyneth[/name_f] would be ok.
All of these names sound fine, I just sometimes prefer other spellings or similar names on some of them. [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] is the only one I dislike.
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] -Not caring for the double nature names together, but individually they’re nice. I really like [name_f]Ivy[/name_f].
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] - I like this. I think the simple [name_f]Rose[/name_f] evens out the heavy syllable middle name.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - Not bad but the one thing about color or description names is that they’re hard to place with noun names. So all I’m getting is the image of a violet colored peral rather than a persons name.
[name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - I think [name_f]Winifred[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] sounds better, but that might just be my personal preference against [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] as a nn name.
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m] -Not bad, but sounds painfully like a book character, like he should be related to [name_f]Juni[/name_f] B [name_m]Jones[/name_m] or an old fashioned children’s book series. But if that’s something you like, then you’re good to go with it.
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] - This sounds like a good solid boys name.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m] - Wouldn’t be bad, but the ending D of the first and starting D of the middle feel like they clash, kind of keeps the full name from rolling off the tongue properly.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m] - I can dig this name. My favorite out of the list.
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]- Sounds a little like you’re describing hazel ivy. It’s word-heavy, but not bad. I think they names would be nicer in separate combos, though.
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]- This looks and sounds nice, except when I say it out loud it kind of sounds like [name_f]Rosie[/name_f] Vangeline, which is a little strange.
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]- Like with the [name_f]Hazel[/name_f] combo, this might be a little too word-heavy. I like the look of the names together, though.
[name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f]- [name_u]Love[/name_u] this! So cute, but still wearable. Definitely my favorite.
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m]- I love [name_u]Charlie[/name_u] over [name_m]Charles[/name_m], and I think it pairs really well with [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m]. Great combo.
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u]- Sounds wonderful together! I really like this.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m]- I don’t think [name_m]Duke[/name_m] sounds right with [name_m]Edward[/name_m]. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Luke[/name_m] would be better, I think.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m]- Completely perfect! Such a good combo.
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f] - I love both of these [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] - I prefer the longer versions of [name_f]Rose[/name_f], such as [name_f]Rosalie[/name_f]. I’m not sure if [name_f]Rosalie[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] works though. So maybe just swapped? [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] or maybe [name_f]Rosaline[/name_f] [name_f]Eve[/name_f]. [name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] - Sounds good [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f] - I love [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] so much, but I do prefer it as a nn. Maybe [name_f]Guinevere[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f], nn [name_f]Winnie[/name_f] or [name_f]Winola[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f], nn [name_f]Winnie[/name_f]
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m] - Again, I like [name_u]Charlie[/name_u], but feel it needs a full name. I also prefer [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] to [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m]. My suggestion would be [name_m]Charleston[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m], nn [name_u]Charlie[/name_u]. (I also love the nn [name_m]Chaz[/name_m]) [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] - I prefer this one swapped. [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] sounds great. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m] - I like the unexecpted middle of [name_m]Duke[/name_m]. I’m not a fan of [name_m]Edward[/name_m], though I do like the nn [name_m]Ned[/name_m]. I would prefer it for [name_m]Edmund[/name_m] or [name_m]Benedict[/name_m]. [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m] - I like this one as well. Like [name_u]Theo[/name_u] and [name_u]Teddy[/name_u] as nn.
[name_f]Hazel[/name_f] [name_f]Ivy[/name_f]: A bit too wordy for me, but both names are very pretty by themselves
[name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f]: I like seeing [name_f]Rose[/name_f] as a first name and love the longer name in the middle
[name_f]Violet[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]: Again, too wordy for me but I like both names separately
[name_f]Winnie[/name_f] [name_f]Beatrice[/name_f]: I am not a huge fan of either name but the combo is nice
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m]: [name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_u]Charlie[/name_u] and [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m] is unexpected. I love unexpected middles!
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u]: [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] is nms but [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] is great. I don’t like the L in [name_m]Samuel[/name_m] clashing with the L in [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] though
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m]: [name_m]Edward[/name_m] is nice and [name_m]Duke[/name_m] is cool, but I don’t like the D to a D sound
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m]: [name_u]Love[/name_u] love love theodore and [name_m]Louis[/name_m] is just okay but the combo works
[name_u]Charlie[/name_u] [name_m]Barnabas[/name_m] - It’s ok
[name_m]Samuel[/name_m] [name_u]Flynn[/name_u] - Good combo, not a fan of either name but good together.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Duke[/name_m] - like it. [name_m]Favorite[/name_m] on your boys list.
[name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_m]Louis[/name_m] - it’s ok.