See the results of this poll: Aleph Echo Bartholomew
Respondents: 54 (This poll is closed)
- Love it : 1 (2%)
- Like it : 9 (17%)
- It’s okay : 18 (33%)
- Don’t like it: 26 (48%)
Sorry to be the early naysayer, but I don’t like the flow of these names, including the ph to echo - it makes me say “Fecco”. Then [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] somehow make each other harder to pronounce. I like unusual but this combo is just too much work!
I like [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m], am “meh” about [name_u]Echo[/name_u] (prefer it on a girl, since it was a nymph in mythology) and dislike [name_m]Aleph[/name_m]. I also think the flow isn’t the greatest. I think I would prefer [name_u]Echo[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_m]Aleph[/name_m].
Ooh, [name_m]Aleph[/name_m]! [name_f]Lovely[/name_f] to see it being considered.
I like each name individually, but I agree that three very unusual, statement-making names in one combo is a bit too much. I would love something slightly simpler like [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_m]Balthasar[/name_m] or [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] Barthélemy, though!
((I will never get over the fact both of my names are boy names and my parents they always wanted a daughter))
[name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_u]Echo[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] is a great name, at first it looked too long but if I take out [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] I feel like I rob the name, if I take out [name_u]Echo[/name_u] then I feel like I may start counting the alphabet when initials of fn and mn follow each other I have a feeling like that heh, so I think [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_u]Echo[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] is just fine
It’s okay.
Although I love [name_u]Echo[/name_u] and do prefer it for a girl, I think it could work well for a boy with the right names, but I don’t think [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] are those names. I don’t think the flow between [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_u]Echo[/name_u] is good.
I do like [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] though, so:
[name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_u]Jude[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m]
[name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_u]Sage[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m]
[name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] [name_m]Bear[/name_m]
I [name_u]LOVE[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m]!
Personally, I’m not a fan of the names individually, but I think it has a nice flow to it.
[name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_u]Echo[/name_u] and [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m]. I’m not a huge fan of [name_m]Aleph[/name_m], and I think it throws off the flow slightly.
I really like the suggestion of [name_m]Balthasar[/name_m]!!
I’d remove [name_u]Echo[/name_u]
I like [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] together, and [name_u]Echo[/name_u] and [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] together, but not [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_u]Echo[/name_u] together. It makes it really choppy.
Personally I would think of a different first with the middle combo of [name_u]Echo[/name_u] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m], or just go with [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m]. I’m guessing you don’t like [name_u]Echo[/name_u] quite enough to place it as a first name, otherwise I’d advocate for that.
I like [name_m]Aleph[/name_m] and [name_u]Echo[/name_u] (but [name_u]Echo[/name_u] on a girl as a middle name), but I’m not a fan of [name_m]Bartholomew[/name_m] at all. I don’t like the flow of the three names together either.