What are your thoughts on this sibset:
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Nathaniel[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name]
Kath xx
[name]LOVE[/name] [name]Lorcan[/name] and [name]Findlay[/name], but I’ve never been a huge fan of [name]Greer[/name]. If you like it, though, go for it!
I agree with the previous poster-- [name]Lorcan[/name] and [name]Findlay[/name] are great, but [name]Greer[/name] just does not have an appealing sound in the least. Plus I would definitely think [name]Greer[/name] was a boy, especially with brothers named [name]Lorcan[/name] and [name]Findlay[/name].
Which set do you think sounds better:
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Nathaniel[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name], or
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Noah[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Abigail[/name]
Kath xx
I like [name]Nathaniel[/name] because of the flow and I like [name]Greta[/name] more than [name]Greer[/name].
I like [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name]…I’m not as fond of names that end in the an, en, or on sound. But that is just my opinion
I like [name]Greer[/name] a lot and the Scottish vibe of the sibset. I prefer [name]Greer[/name] [name]Abigail[/name] just because I think the extra syllable balances a bit nicer.
What about [name]Hannah[/name] [name]Greer[/name]?
To be painfully honest, I think that [name]Findlay[/name] looks a little weird, it’s like “why is there a d in there?”.
[name]Lorcan[/name] is a perfectly decent name.
I think [name]Greer[/name] would seem more feminine if you spelled it [name]Grier[/name], it also doesn’t have the awkward “the same letter twice” and personally I think it looks prettier that way.
[name]Findlay[/name] [name]Nathaniel[/name] & [name]Greer[/name] [name]Abigail[/name] sound best to me
I’m set on the first names, I’m just wondering how the middle names work together? I want the names to sound tasteful, strong and traditional.
Kath xx
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Nathaniel[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name]
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Noah[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Abigail[/name]
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Aaron[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Hannah[/name]
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Aaron[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Jemima[/name]
Which is best (and why?)
Thanks, Kath xx
My Favourite are ** - i think that they flow well together.
[name]Just[/name] had another combination suggested to me:
[name]Lorcan[/name] [name]Caleb[/name], [name]Findlay[/name] [name]Nicholas[/name] and [name]Greer[/name] [name]Abigail[/name]
What do you think?
[name]Do[/name] these names work together?
What are your first impressions of the style / what would you think if you heard of siblings with these names?
Kath xx 