Did you edit your post because you decided the ‘rules’ you had for your other children’s names were no longer so necessary? I remember something about 13 letters and 5 syllables?
[name]Phoebe[/name] [name]Junia[/name]: this is the sunniest combination for your girls. [name]Phoebe[/name] is very cheerful, as is [name]Junia[/name], and the mystery behind [name]Junia[/name] in the NT is very intriguing (was she a female Apostle?)
[name]Elza[/name] [name]Agnes[/name]: I would prefer the softer [name]Elsa[/name]. I actually genuinely love [name]Agnes[/name], but many people consider it completely beyond the pale to name a baby [name]Agnes[/name]. I think it looks pretty on the page, has such a long and distinguished naming history, and very uplifting associations. You could try writing it in a way that would give it a gentler European pronunciation, like the model [name]Agyness[/name], or variants like [name]Nessa[/name], [name]Nesta[/name], [name]Annis[/name], [name]Annice[/name]…
[name]Martha[/name] [name]Magdalene[/name]-- prefer [name]Martha[/name] with [name]Susanna[/name], and [name]Magdalena[/name] as a first name. You’re sort of crossing images with this one-- people will expect [name]Mary[/name] [name]Magdalene[/name] if [name]Magdalene[/name] were used in the middle spot.
[name]Esther[/name] [name]Talulla[/name]-- where did [name]Talulla[/name] come from? I see a lot of devout names, and then [name]Talulla[/name]? I personally think [name]Tallulah[/name] Bankhead is an abominable namesake (wiki her) and find the name to have an almost cartoonish sound. [name]Esther[/name] on the other hand is beautiful and underused. You could also consider the original Hebrew [name]Hadassah[/name], or [name]Esther[/name]'s rival [name]Vashti[/name].
[name]Naama[/name] [name]Ruth[/name]: [name]Naama[/name] is very interesting! It’s an old, old, old Aramaic name meaning ‘pleasant.’ It’s very difficult to pronounce properly unless you speak a Semitic language (Arabic, Aramaic, Coptic or Hebrew); you can anglicize it by saying ‘Nay-ma.’ I don’t care for it paired with [name]Ruth[/name]; the combination seems too abrupt. This would be a good place for an English standard like [name]Elizabeth[/name] or [name]Madeline[/name].
[name]Mahala[/name] [name]Naomi[/name]: I think [name]Mahala[/name] is closer to the Hawaiian greetin ‘mahalo’ than to [name]Mahalia[/name]. This might still be a one-woman name in the form of [name]Mahalia[/name] [name]Jackson[/name], but it’s certainly fun to say. Paired with [name]Naomi[/name], however, the sounds all run together (they’re so soft). If you go with a first name as grand as [name]Mahalia[/name], I would select a light, sweet middle name ([name]Grace[/name], [name]Rose[/name], [name]Hope[/name], etc).
[name]Reverie[/name]-- quite different from your other choices. A reverie is a nice thing to fall into, but it seems a little contrived for a name, especially in a family surrounded by biblical classics.
[name]Azariah[/name] is a true biblical rarity, though lots of personnages actually bore it. I don’t think it pairs well with [name]Jesse[/name].
[name]Nicodemus[/name] is a fun name, and it is still given occasionally in Greece, but in the States I think it would work best in the middle slot. I’d salvage [name]Jesse[/name] and create ‘[name]Jesse[/name] [name]Nicodemus[/name]’ here.
[name]Obediah[/name]: too far gone to be resurrected for a boy. [name]Malachi[/name]? [name]Josiah[/name]? [name]Joel[/name]? [name]Hosea[/name]? [name]Micah[/name]? those would all be fine.