[name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] and [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Hollis[/name_u] are tied for me. [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] would also be very handsome.
I voted for [name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m], because I think the connect to your mother’s name is just a tad bit clearer, but [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Hollis[/name_u] is also great.
I like [name_u]Parker[/name_u] [name_u]Hollis[/name_u] and [name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] though [name_u]Parker[/name_u] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] or [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] would be great!!
I voted [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_u]Hollis[/name_u], but really like [name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] as well. I agree with the pp’s that [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] would be fantastic
[name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] is the SWEETEST, I love it!!!
I wouldn’t do [name_m]Jack[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] as pp have suggested. To me the 2 short, 1 syllable names don’t flow as well. If you did [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] (nn [name_m]Jack[/name_m]) though, that would be 100% tied with [name_m]Oliver[/name_m] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] for me!
Of your combos I love [name_u]Bailey[/name_u] [name_u]Hollis[/name_u]. If you want to honor [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] and you like [name_u]Bailey[/name_u] what about [name_u]Bellamy[/name_u]? It has the bell syllable like in [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] and it’s similar to [name_u]Bailey[/name_u] which you already love. [name_u]Bellamy[/name_u] [name_m]Abel[/name_m] or [name_u]Bellamy[/name_u] [name_u]Mason[/name_u] would be perfect.