[name_f]Do[/name_f] you like with [name_m]Silas[/name_m]?
[name_m]Heath[/name_m]
[name_m]Ephraim[/name_m]
[name_u]Seth[/name_u]
[name_m]Gilbert[/name_m]
[name_m]Jonah[/name_m]
Not pg, just thinking…
[name_f]Do[/name_f] you like with [name_m]Silas[/name_m]?
[name_m]Heath[/name_m]
[name_m]Ephraim[/name_m]
[name_u]Seth[/name_u]
[name_m]Gilbert[/name_m]
[name_m]Jonah[/name_m]
Not pg, just thinking…
are my favorite names on your list.
[name_u]Seth[/name_u] is fine, but I tend to avoid two of the same initial letters.
[name_m]Heath[/name_m] is OK.
[name_m]Ephraim[/name_m] - I can’t help this - reminds me of the word phlegm.
[name_m]Jonah[/name_m]! I love it.
I think [name_m]Silas[/name_m] and [name_m]Jonah[/name_m] go very well together.
I agree with pp, [name_m]Silas[/name_m] & [name_m]Jonah[/name_m] go really well together
[name_m]Ephraim[/name_m] and [name_m]Gilbert[/name_m] would be my picks. Similar feel and rarity.
I like all the names on your list though, and none of them would be bad with [name_m]Silas[/name_m].
[name_m]Heath[/name_m] - cool name, underused, but it feels very romantic and natural (Wuthering Heights!) where [name_m]Silas[/name_m] feels stronger and more serious.
[name_m]Jonah[/name_m] - lovely name, but feels more popular
[name_u]Seth[/name_u] - not as much oomph as [name_m]Silas[/name_m], very soft and kind, and the double S would bug me
With [name_m]Silas[/name_m] I like [name_m]Jonah[/name_m] best. I love [name_u]Seth[/name_u] but I think its a bit too similar.
I think [name_m]Jonah[/name_m] would be quite fetching as a sibling name for a [name_m]Silas[/name_m].
I love [name_m]Heath[/name_m]! I think [name_m]Silas[/name_m] and [name_m]Heath[/name_m] is very unexpected.
Definitely [name_m]Jonah[/name_m]. They have the same softer feel.
My order for those choices would be
[name_m]Jonah[/name_m]
[name_m]Heath[/name_m]
[name_m]Ephraim[/name_m]
[name_m]Gilbert[/name_m]
[name_u]Seth[/name_u]