[name_u]Ever[/name_u] look at your names list and realize that they wouldn’t all work together?
Can somebody help me kinda group this shortened version of my list into cohesive sibsets?
[name_f]Alice[/name_f]*
[name_f]Danielle[/name_f]*
[name_f]Daphne[/name_f]
[name_f]Helene[/name_f]
[name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]*
[name_f]Lydia[/name_f]*
[name_u]Ruby[/name_u]
[name_f]Ruth[/name_f]
[name_f]Veronica[/name_f]
[name_f]Winona[/name_f]
(the starred ones are s/o approved names)
[name_f]Alice[/name_f], [name_f]Helene[/name_f], [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] & [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]
[name_f]Danielle[/name_f], [name_f]Veronica[/name_f] & [name_f]Ruth[/name_f]
[name_f]Lydia[/name_f], [name_u]Ruby[/name_u] & [name_f]Daphne[/name_f]
I think [name_f]Winona[/name_f] is kind of an odd one out. I’m not sure where I would place her.
[name_f]Alice[/name_f], [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f], [name_u]Ruby[/name_u] & [name_f]Helene[/name_f]
[name_f]Danielle[/name_f] & [name_f]Veronica[/name_f]
[name_f]Daphne[/name_f] & [name_f]Winona[/name_f]
[name_f]Ruth[/name_f] maybe as it sounds old compared to others?
I think these ones work well together
[name_f]Alice[/name_f] & [name_u]Ruby[/name_u]
[name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] & [name_f]Veronica[/name_f]
[name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f], [name_f]Alice[/name_f] and [name_f]Lydia[/name_f] (my great grandmothers)
or
[name_f]Alyss[/name_f] and [name_f]Danielle[/name_f] (to be modern)
I like these best of your list. Guess I’m on the same wavelength as your SO! 