Why am I so angry over this?

[name]One[/name] of DH’s sisters is pregnant with a boy and they are expecting within the next month. I was talking to her three or so months ago about possible names that she likes. So she told me that she didn’t know the name yet, but she was thinking of naming her son after my DH (his first name). My reaction is kind of surprised, and I asked him later what he thought. He was also surprised and just told me to forget about it, since she usually picks another name at the hospital. We are using his middle name for a first name for the next son, and I was wanting to use his first for another son if we were blessed with one.

Fast forward to this past week. We were hanging out with her when someone brought up baby names. She immediately said that since it is okay, she is going to use his first name. I was shocked to say the least and looked to her husband to get some help against it, but he doesn’t care at all what the name will be. So I mentioned what I thought, and she told me that it is already set and we aren’t using it anyway. We never told her we weren’t using it, she just assumes since we haven’t used it yet.

What should I do? I just can’t picture a little boy that close in the family who is not our son with my husband’s name. It makes me feel weird and angry. I don’t want to get mad at her, since she is very hormonal and we actually don’t have the best relationship in the first place.

Any recommendations? I am sorry this was so long! He doesn’t care either way and says we can find other names that are just as nice. Of course, I don’t own the name, and it is her brother’s name so she has full rights to it. Am I overreacting?

I definitely think it’s weird and you have every right to be upset over it. If my brother-in-law and his wife named their son after my partner I wouldn’t be impressed. Maybe if you were 100% done having children, but otherwise it’s too close to home. What to do about it is much trickier. I think the responsibility should fall on your husband to talk his sister about your reservations. [name]Even[/name] if he doesn’t mind, YOU do and it will probably sound better coming from him than you.

Thats quite a dilemma.
[name]Just[/name] a few thoughts. (I know they won’t make it easier on you, you won’t feel less angry, disappointed, or betrayed). But it might help to put things in perspective.

  1. Is she naming her son after you husband or just giving him a name your husband has? If she’s naming him to honor your husband I’d feel bad for her if he doesn’t care either way. [name]How[/name] awful to try to name your child (the most precious thing you have) after someone you feel your strongly connected to (esp if it’s a family member) and they don’t reciprocate that connection. If that’s the case maybe she’s saying “brother dearest, I’d like for us to be closer. I’m bringing you an offering.”
  2. What is your hubby’s name? If it’s something that can have multiple nn’s you could request that she not use the name your husband goes by. You’d find that confusing and difficult. (Though it might be better for your husband to state this as if it were his idea). Would this make it easier for you?
  3. You might not have the strongest relationship with her, but polite and respectful honesty is always the best policy. I’d let her know that while you were planning on naming a first son with his mn a second was planned with the fn. Let her know you don’t mean to dissuade her from her name choice - as he’s clearly a fabulous guy to honor - but you wanted to give her a heads up before her baby was born. Though if you do tell her this and then have a second son (and she didn’t use his hame) and you don’t use his name it could become a long standing point of contention in what seems to be a touchy relationship to begin with.
  4. Your husband might be right. She might plan to name her son after him and in the hospital decide to name him something completely different instead.

I know it can be hard when you have names for potential babies in your head and you grow attached to them and then someone else decides to use them, but the reality is that we cannot lay claim to names, especially when we are at least two pregnancies away from using them. People often change the names they are thinking of using, so regardless of what your sister in law chooses, you may not use the name either. It is a lovely way for her to honour her brother, and if I were you, I’d try to be pleased that another little baby will be brought into the world with a name you think is gorgeous. I think Lexiem makes some great points too!

Hey thanks for the responses. I agree with what everyone has said. I guess I am being just as hormonal as her right now.

To answer some questions: His name is [name]Michael[/name], and he goes by [name]Mike[/name] usually but I sometimes call him [name]Mikey[/name] because that was his nickname when he was younger and I love to tease him with it. She was very close to him when they were growing up so I can see how she loves his name. I haven’t been confrontational with the issue, because I hate confrontations. I would hate to ruin our relationship further just because of a simple name. It is true that she has all rights to use the name. I just dislike being irritated over this issue.

If she does end up using it, I guess I can still use it as a middle name. I am sure that would be okay.

I think you just have to accept it and move on from it.

Personally, I think it’s quite an honor that she is planning to name her son after your DH (her brother), and I’d like to think I’d be quite pleased that someone thought the man I love was worthy of naming their child after.

My mom always loved the name [name]Caroline[/name], which was the name of her cousin who sadly died in her teens, and they were very close. However, my mom’s brother used it first (in memory of [name]Caroline[/name]), even though he knew how close my mom and her were.

Mom was a bit upset at first admittedly, but she soon realized what was important is that someone had honored [name]Caroline[/name], not who had done so.

Family matters, especially with in-laws is always odd ground to navigate. Though, I do agree that if something is said, that it Should be from your husband and not you. With that, I have to point out that in our own situation that would mean that it was a lost cause, and I’d just have to process and deal with it. Because my husband hates confrontation more than I ever dreamed possible based on his personality. It would never be worth it in his opinion.

I can totally see your feelings. My father passed away unexpectedly when I was a teenager and my older sister was also still in child-bearing years. Not long after, one of his brothers named his new son after him. I can see why he wanted to, but I really couldn’t comprehend why he would have taken that for himself, since they hadn’t been close in YEARS (nothing bad happened, just that 7 of the 9 of siblings were spread out across the country, the two remaining “local” were my father and a different brother). Especially when there was still every chance in the world that one of my father’s children would want to use it for a grandchild.

If I really felt Strongly about it, the only thing I personally would think about possibly doing is (with my husband’s approval) try to set up the situation again, either with him there prepared to say something or maybe even someone from “your side” (a family member, friend, etc… the younger and/or more vocal/opinionated the better). Try to get the conversation back in that direction (easier if it’s not your husband doing it, since he already knows the planned name) and have the other person say something, “jokingly” and in a light-hearted manner, along the lines of “Well, that will certainly make things odd/confusing at family gatherings if they ever have a [name]Michael[/name] [name]Jr[/name].!” Then, if she mentions the fact that you’re Not using it, that’s a good time to say that actually it has always been an option and is still on the table. In that circumstance, it’s not a situation of you Confronting her about it.

That would be the best way to handle something in MY family. No idea about yours though.

And, on the other hand, if she Does feel strongly about it, that’s something to consider too. You’ve mentioned that your first plan is to name a Possible, [name]Future[/name] son with your husband’s middle name. And then, only if you happen to have another son, possibly use his first name for that one. That’s a lot of “ifs” in the future compared to her “definite” situation in the here and now. I’m not sure of the gender of your first-born, but if it’s a boy and you didn’t choose to use hubby’s fn with him, I can understand her assumption that you weren’t going to use it at all. Or, even if she knows that you plan to pick his mn for the first/next boy that comes around. Usually when people use a parent’s name (especially their fn) it seems to be with the first child if it’s really important to them, because there are no guarantees of any future children. Some will even go so far as giving a first born daughter a form of the father’s name, since there’s no guarantee of future children, or a future boy, especially. It would really be an unfortunate situation if trouble were caused over this now that affects everyone’s relationships in the long term and it turns out that you only end up having more girls, or only one more son. Then no one gets to use the name.

Honestly, I feel like your sister-in-law wanting to honor your husband is very sweet and you making an issue out of it would just be a very ugly thing to do. If you had an issue with it, you should have said something when she brought the idea up months ago. And really, there’s no reason why you can’t still use the name [name]Michael[/name] for a future son. There are plenty of cousins that have the same name (especially if it’s a family name) and no one thinks anything of it. [name]Just[/name] be happy that your husband has a sister that loves him so much and proud that you have a husband that multiple people feel is worth naming their children after.

I don’t know if this will help, but every first born daughter on my mother’s side of the family is named [name]Laura[/name]. My mother has 5 [name]Laura[/name] cousins, and she makes the 6th [name]Laura[/name]. They all go by their middle name in the family, but since the rise of FB and the like, I am now “friends” with at least 6 Lauras… all related to me. They all like it… when the family is all together, we call out for “[name]Laura[/name]” just to see them all turn around. My mom ended the tradition with me, and I’ve always been a little sad about it. I understand why you would be upset, but it’s not SO unusual for cousins to have the same name.

I don’t really think it is fair to be angry at her. She obviously must love and admire her brother if she has considered naming her son after him. I know I have considered doing it as well. It is an honor and not an underhanded name steal. I also agree with pp.

Previous posters make wonderful points, and here are a few more:

  1. That is one of the most common names in history, to the point that a lot of people who have that name feel that it is “generic.”
  2. Having a [name]Junior[/name] named after his father can be extremely confusing, much more so than having a relative in a different household sharing a name. Being a [name]Junior[/name] can also place a burden on a son of feeling that he is expected to be a mini version of Dad instead of his own person (obviously not all feel this way, but many do.)
  3. If you want to name a son after DH anyway, go ahead. I only have one female first cousin; she’s 3 months younger than I am, and we have the same name (a much less common one at that). We always enjoyed the fact that we are the same age and have the same name, and it never caused any trouble. It’s not even a family name or anything like that-- my aunt just copied my mom!
    I hope this helps…

The same thing happened in our family with my dad’s name, but no one was upset about it. My dad’s siblings named their kids (my cousins) after my dad to honor my dad. Later when my dad had a son (my little brother) he was named after my grandpa. So there are a few people in our very large extended family with my dad’s name. The way that they avoid confusion is to use different nicknames with those kids. My parents have never expressed any anger over these names. I’ve lived with these names for so long that it doesn’t seem weird to me. My dad has a really rare name that isn’t even on nameberry. I don’t know if that makes a difference in this case.

I agree with all above, especially the point that your plan to use the name requires not one, but two theoretical future male pregnancies. Your sister-in-law will have a baby in the next couple of months, and I think that trumps.

And as many have said, the name in question is [name]Michael[/name]-- by far the most common male name of our generation. It’s not Cadwalladar or Caractacus or anything else that will obviously stand out.

I think I would try to follow your husband’s cues about it. Does he feel weird about his nephew being named for him or is he flattered? You said they were close growing up, so honestly, I think it’s really sweet that she wants to name her son after her brother, just complicated by the fact that you were planning to use the name too.

I dont think there’s anything wrong with both of you using [name]Michael[/name]! Especially if you had planned to use it as a middle name anyway.

I think the only person who really has a say is your husband. If he doesn’t want the child named after him, then he has to speak up, not you. If you speak up, you just look like the villain. If he doesn’t care or is honored by it, then I think you have to just let it go. You can always use it later, even as a first name. He’s your husband, you have every right to use it even if she did.

Well if you feel very strongly about it, I’d point out to her next time the topic arises and she mentions you weren’t going to use the name anyways that yes in fact you were planning on using it. But that’s about all I’d say on the matter, otherwise you do risk causing tension in that relationship.

Thanks everyone for the feedback. It is nice getting an unbiased perspective. I have been pretty immature about this issue. I am glad that I asked because it helped me to understand that this is a good thing. I need to look at it from her perspective. He is her closest brother and she has full rights to the name. Like another poster said, we can still use it as a middle name.

Thanks again!