[name_f]My[/name_f] friend and I got into an argument over this, so I want to see what you think. Could [name_u]Will[/name_u] be a nickname for [name_u]Ellis[/name_u]?
I donāt think so. The only thing they have im common is the double L.
No, they have nothing in common really.
No, why
No.
I donāt really get it.
Thanks everyone! I didnāt get why [name_u]Will[/name_u] would be a nickname for [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] either!
Where theres a will theres a way
No- despite the double L, both names are very different.
I canāt see it
No, [name_f]Ell[/name_f] makes more sense
no, canāt see it, although iād be interested to hear the logic
I really donāt get the logic! [name_f]My[/name_f] friend seems to think: Ellis>Ell>Ill>Will
I suggested the nickname [name_u]Eli[/name_u], which make more sense, but she doesnāt like it. Well, we were just talking hypothetically anyways, none of us are old enough to have kids.
Not unless [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] is a middle to a first name starting with a W. Like [name_m]Westley[/name_m] [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] - [name_u]Will[/name_u]. [name_m]Even[/name_m] then thatās a stretch.
I asked my friend and she says that [name_u]Will[/name_u] as a nickname for [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] ājust feels rightā.
Donāt see it!
I really donāt think so, and Iām usually willing to be pretty stretch-y with nicknames. (And honestly, calling an [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] [name_u]Will[/name_u] takes away all the pizazz and magic from the name, in my opinion). [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] is short enough to not really need a nickname, and if you really want one, I think just [name_f]El[/name_f] is a perfectly gender neutral
Does she like the name [name_m]Willis[/name_m]? Sounds similar to [name_u]Ellis[/name_u] and can use [name_u]Will[/name_u] as a nn?
I donāt think she likes [name_m]Willis[/name_m], but Iāll ask. Itās not a big deal, since sheās not having a kid anytime soon (we are both too young to have kids).
Yes. Anything can be a nickname for anything else. There are no rules about this.
Is it obvious? No
Is it expected? No
Has it been done before? Who knows.
Does it āworkā? For me, yes. [name_u]Will[/name_u], like [name_m]Ned[/name_m], [name_m]Ted[/name_m], [name_u]Joe[/name_u], [name_u]Jack[/name_u] and other generally used boy nicknames work fine with lots of full names that may only share one letter or sound.
We have no problem with [name_u]Jack[/name_u] for [name_u]John[/name_u], [name_m]Dick[/name_m] for [name_m]Richard[/name_m], [name_m]Ted[/name_m] for [name_m]Theodore[/name_m], [name_m]Ned[/name_m] for [name_u]Edward[/name_u], [name_m]Bob[/name_m] for [name_u]Robert[/name_u], etc. This is because these short forms have a long history of use, not because they are particularly like the full name. I like the freshness and ingenuity when people come up with their own new versions of these.