Well I know a little girl [name]Darcey[/name] (10 months) whose mum had a bit of a shock to find 2 or 3 other [name]Darcy[/name]/[name]Darcey[/name]/Darcies in her baby class. All girls. This is in NW [name]England[/name], so it’s popularity may be regional. I think the spellings combined put it about the 70s in [name]England[/name], and about the same in NI, where I am originally from.
HOWEVER, I’m not trying to dissuade you from using [name]Darcy[/name] for a boy. Rather, I’m just trying to prove my point that, despite this, I still see [name]Darcy[/name] as a boy’s name. It’s never quite sat right on a girl for me, even the little [name]Darcey[/name] who I mentioned previously, even though she’s a darling. As you can see, [name]Darcy[/name] remains on my list (below) despite all of this. So I think you should use it! [name]Darcy[/name] [name]Thomas[/name] is handsome and dashing. =D