See the results of this poll: Your favorite(s)?
Respondents: 63 (This poll is closed)
- Maple Aurora : 33 (49%)
- Maple Winter : 14 (21%)
- Maple Violet : 16 (24%)
- Something else. (please comment): 5 (7%)
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f] sounds nice, but it’s overall a little too naturey.
I think [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] is my favorite. It reminds me of collecting tree sap in a silent snowy woods, and warm maple syrup on hot pancakes next to a frosty window. 
I prefer [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f]. I think more than one noun in a name is too much. And [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] has a very nice rhythm.
I voted for [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f], as I find the other two make it too “wordy” and not enough name.
I love the imagery! Thanks! 
Thank you everyone else who replied! I’m not the slightest bit worried about the name being too wordy, nature-y, or “out there”. There is already going to be a “normal”, super common name in the mix ([name_u]Chelsea[/name_u]) to balance out everything. That does NOT worry me at all! I love word and nature names (they’re usually both) very much! None of these names are too wordy or nature-y for me!
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]. mmm I see a girl in her fluffy grey wolf-like coat eating her syrupy pancakes in a little cabin. [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] is nice, but [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] is nicer, and flows much better. Good [name_m]Luck[/name_m]!
~[name_f]Jasmine[/name_f]
You said you hate using one without the other. Have you thought about [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]? [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] [name_f]Maple[/name_f]? Or [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]? [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] sounds out of nowhere, to be honest, and I personally don’t think it sounds very good with any of your combinations.
I like [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] with [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u].
All of those are too much noun/wordy for me. I would go with something more classic as a middle:
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Catherine[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Juliet[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Emmeline[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Isabelle[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Lucia[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Genevieve[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Wilhelmina[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Eliana[/name_f]
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Arabella[/name_f]
I’m glad that you love [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u]! [name_f]Love[/name_f] the imagery! Thx!
Aw I adore [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f]!! Sounds super beautiful!! <3
I would love to use [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] in the first name slot, but I can’t. It just doesn’t feel right as a first name (Idk why… It’s one of my favorite names!), and the popularity kind of turns me off. I’m only considering it as a middle name. I guess you’ve never seen any of my other threads. I’m changing my name and [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] is currently my first name. I’ve decided to keep [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] in my name for a couple of different reasons. I know any combo I come up with won’t be as good as it could be without [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u], but I’m just going to make that work! The first name is my main concern anyway. Thanks for your reply!
I love word names! [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u]'s already going to be in the middle, so they wouldn’t all be word names. [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Arabella[/name_f] is very pretty! But it’s not really what I’m looking for.
Thx! I’m glad that some people up here like it!
Thx! I think it’s beautiful too! I think it sounds/feels really magical!
I have a [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]. We have a really common last name so I like the spice the first two names give.
[name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]'s so sweet! [name_m]How[/name_m] is it having a [name_f]Maple[/name_f]? It is hard at times? Or do you love it?! What does she think (if she’s old enough to have an opinion)?
I chose [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f]. [name_f]Maple[/name_f], [name_u]Winter[/name_u] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] are all very obviously noun/nature names, and any combos with them seem a little too literal, like you’re describing something. I know that [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] could also technically be considered a nature name, but the reference to the [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] Borealis is a little farther of a stretch, and one that everyone may not know, not to mention it flows better with [name_f]Maple[/name_f] and [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u] because it breaks up the two-syllable names.
I like [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] and [name_f]Maple[/name_f] [name_u]Winter[/name_u] best and just by reading your responses I get the feeling that [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] would suit you the best and goes so well with [name_u]Chelsea[/name_u]. I love the name [name_f]Maple[/name_f]! Majorly good taste for that! [name_f]Maple[/name_f] Menorah is my first choice for a little girl so I get the appeal and [name_f]Aurora[/name_f] was suggested to me and I think it is lovely if it suits your last name then I would go for it. Good luck!