GIRLS
Valkyrie- I’ve seen this before, and I really dislike it. I think it sounds awkward and I don’t think it’s usable.
[name]Vesper[/name]- It’s wearable but I don’t think it’s very pretty.
[name]Valentine[/name] - totally doable. I’d be inclined to pronounce it like the boy name, though, which I’m not exactly sure how I feel about that, but I think it’s workable.
[name]Thessaly[/name]- Definitely doable, too. I feel like I could be named this and not hate my parents for it 
[name]Odessa[/name]- wearable, though not one I like,
[name]Avalon[/name]- Definite eye roll from me on this one. I think it’s trying too hard. I can see it working, though.
[name]Artemis[/name] - ditto, I don’t get this one at all. I don’t like the sound of it and I definitely wouldn’t want it to be my name.
[name]Halcyon[/name]- I kind of want to like it, but I definitely do not. I don’t know how to pronounce it, so that’s a knock against it. I’d go for Hecate or [name]Hortensia[/name], though.
BOYS
[name]Zephyr[/name]- it’s usable… I’ve seen people use it, but I don’t personally find it usable. Does that make sense?
[name]Arrow[/name]- I see the appeal, and it’s usable in a hippy-crunchy-“I like attention” kind of way. It’s a “mom blog” name like [name]Poet[/name] or [name]Boheme[/name], etc. It’s not that bad. Except when you say it, it sounds like “Aero” which makes me think chocolate.
[name]Waldo[/name]- As a middle name…? I’m not sure I could give this a green light as a first name, but then again, a lot of names on my list are of similar style. It could work, but I’m not sure if I’d want it to, haha.
[name]Atlas[/name]- I [name]LOVE[/name] [name]Atlas[/name]! It’s really, really hard to pair, though, so it doesn’t sound like a reference book. I’m also pretty sure my kid would not appreciate being named [name]Atlas[/name], even though I think it’s awesome. I’m not sure it’s usable, but I do like it a lot (I also like it for the body part reference, not for the book, lol)
[name]Marlowe[/name]- Erm… it’s usable.
[name]Merlin[/name]- totally not usable even though I just saw a blog where this is one of the kids’ names. I sincerely don’t think this is a great thing to do to your kid. It doesn’t make me roll my eyes in general, but as the name of a person born now, it definitely does.
[name]Darwin[/name]- I think it has potential! [name]Dexter[/name] and [name]Dawson[/name] are good to go, and I don’t think [name]Darwin[/name] is far off. It isn’t the most appearing sounding name, in my opinion, but it’s totally usable.
[name]Willoughby[/name] (nn [name]Willo[/name])- I’m wrinkling my nose. I do have to say, I’d like [name]Willow[/name] on a boy in a hypothetical kind of way. I think [name]Willoughby[/name] is usable, but it’s not really usable under most circumstances.
EITHER
[name]Starling[/name]- I can’t figure out how this would work as anything other than a middle name. There’s a British diver with this as a last name, and it did strike me, but I don’t think it’s good as a first name,
[name]Quincy[/name]- Not for ‘either’. For a boy, sure. For a girl, no.
[name]Dove[/name]- I like this! [name]Gregory[/name] [name]Smith[/name]'s character on Rookie [name]Blue[/name] (a Canadian show about police) is [name]Dov[/name], which I think is cool. I like [name]Dove[/name] on a girl. I wouldn’t use this as a first name, though, and I wouldn’t use [name]Dove[/name] on a boy, honestly, but I do like it on a girl!
Sorry, this got to be super long!