We’re expecting, and our baby is 90% a boy; my doctor is pretty sure of it, but as the baby is being pretty modest, we can’t tell for sure.
Hubby and I are thinking about two middle names for our little one at the moment, as we recently found out it was a tradition in his family a few generations back that supposedly brought luck to the family.
The names below aren’t listed in order of preference.
[name]Leo[/name] [name]Sebastian[/name] [name]Felix[/name]
[name]Jack[/name] [name]Emerson[/name] [name]Milo[/name]
[name]Charles[/name] [name]Indigo[/name] [name]Felix[/name] ([name]Charlie[/name])
[name]Violet[/name] [name]Aurora[/name] [name]Hazel[/name]
[name]Alice[/name] [name]Matilda[/name] [name]Ruby[/name]
[name]Rose[/name] [name]Felicity[/name] [name]Luna[/name]
[name]Eloise[/name] [name]Clementine[/name] [name]June[/name] ([name]Lola[/name])
[name]Georgia[/name] [name]Beatrice[/name] [name]Plum[/name] ([name]Georgi[/name])
Alright. Should we use the second middles? Our last name is [name]Griffin[/name].
We have a problem, though: we’re more excited about the combo as a whole than the first name. We don’t think we’d use any of the middles as first name as they are a bit much, but we feel as though the firsts as they are are a tad dull. Advice? Opinions?
We’d love love love brutal honesty when it comes to the combos and especially the first names.
Nothing’s set in stone yet, so feel free to do whatever.
Suggestions would be greatly appreciated as well.
Thanks so much, Berries!
~[name]Elizabeth[/name]
I love your reasoning for two middle names and think it’s very valid and a fine naming practice in any event. I don’t think your names are boring at all. Also, [name]Sebastian[/name] and [name]Felix[/name] could make great first names, as well as ALL of your female middle names (except maybe [name]Plum[/name], and [name]Luna[/name], which is too trendy for my liking).