Depends on proximity and how frequently they are going to see each other, but most likely no deal. [name_u]Rose[/name_u] is such a strong part of each name that it would feel almost like copying to me
You want to name your first son “John [name_u]Walter[/name_u] Sorensen IV” after yourself (and your dad and grandpa), but you end up having twin boys. In other words, would you keep the tradition/legacy going by naming one of the twins that way, potentially causing the 2nd born twin to feel less important when he doesn’t have a name in the family line?