[name_u]Flannery[/name_u] [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] is gorgeous!
I love the idea of [name_m]Everhart[/name_m] “[name_m]Hart[/name_m]” as her little brother. [name_u]Flannery[/name_u] and [name_m]Everhart[/name_m] is adorable! Fenwick is cool, too, and I think [name_u]Flannery[/name_u] and Fenwick sound adorable together, and work together well, but I hesitate to use alliteration like that, and with “F” being a more unusual letter, it seems even more noticeable.
I voted for [name_m]Everhart[/name_m] - handsome, distinguished and goes so well with [name_u]Flannery[/name_u]. [name_u]Love[/name_u] the nn [name_m]Hart[/name_m] too!
[name_m]Booker[/name_m] - rhymes with bad words and sounds too surnamey [name_m]Pryor[/name_m] - too wordy [name_m]Banyan[/name_m] - not a fan, just not a nice sound Fenwick - makes me think of Fenway [name_m]Park[/name_m]; which may actually be kind of a cool association depending where you live [name_u]Shiloh[/name_u] - makes me think of Brangelina, sorry!
[name_u]Flannery[/name_u] is so rare and obscure that I think [name_m]Everhart[/name_m] is the most appropriate option. There’s nothing wrong with the other options, but I feel that they lack the elegance that [name_u]Flannery[/name_u] and [name_m]Everhart[/name_m] possess.
I started typing out a response and then read this one and it had already said EVERYTHING I was thinking. [name_m]Just[/name_m] pretend all of this was said twice.
Wow! Thanks for the feedback. We’re leaning pretty strongly towards [name_m]Booker[/name_m] at the moment. Because [name_u]Flannery[/name_u] is somewhat unisex, we wanted our boy name to stand out as clearly masculine (even though we tend to actually like softer names). I like the connection to [name_m]Booker[/name_m] T. [name_m]Washington[/name_m] as well. Tuskegee is actually not far from where I grew up. It shouldn’t be a problem with his surname (sounds a bit like [name_f]Dee[/name_f]-Boyle).