I love [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]! It’s very beautiful. I don’t particularly like the name [name_f]Edith[/name_f] but [name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] is sort of cool, very different styles and sounds but they work together and complement each other. Using names from your signature, I love [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] or [name_u]Ruby[/name_u] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]. A few other ideas…
[name_f]Bronwyn[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Arwen[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Giselle[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_u]Eden[/name_u] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Ivy[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]April[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Catherine[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Joy[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
Or I’d suggest using it as a first, I think it would be lovely.
I think [name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] is a lovely combination a little outdated for my taste, but together they go lovely. [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] has lovely starry imagery.
[name_f]Edie[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] would be nice, [name_f]Edie[/name_f] as either an alternative or a nickname for [name_f]Edith[/name_f].
What about [name_f]Eila[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]? [name_f]Eila[/name_f] is pronounced like [name_f]Isla[/name_f] but is a lot prettier visually, imo.
Or how about…
[name_f]Flora[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Isobelle[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Jessamine[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Laurel[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Olivia[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Victoria[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
[name_f]Willa[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]
Or as a first name…
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]May[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Esme[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Florence[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Pearl[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Margaret[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Grace[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Isobelle[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Jade[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Willow[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Violet[/name_f]
[name_f]Celestia[/name_f] [name_f]Yasmin[/name_f]
My first thought, and a random fun fact, is that [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] was the middle name of “[name_m]Little[/name_m] House” author [name_f]Laura[/name_f] Ingalls [name_m]Wilder[/name_m]…full name was [name_f]Caroline[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] Ingalls. Nerdy little bookworm moment is over lol anyhow, it sounds really pretty and, while I find it a bit too out there to use as a first name, I agree that it is a great-sounding middle name. [name_f]Edith[/name_f] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] is gorgeous. Other suggestions:
That’s really all I can think of right now I honestly think that the names in your signature would go great with [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] as a middle!
I always have a problem with the transition from -th to S-, either it sounds like Ediths Elestia or [name_f]Edith[/name_f] Thelestia or I have to take an artificial break between the two names which makes them not roll off the tongue as nicely as I’d like it.
From your signature, I quite like [name_u]Ruby[/name_u], [name_f]Jane[/name_f], [name_f]Kate[/name_f], [name_f]Mary[/name_f], [name_f]Pearl[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] with [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]!
I love [name_f]Celestia[/name_f]. I think it works as a first or a middle, but I do prefer it in the middle spot (because saying “[name_f]Celestia[/name_f]” 800 times a day could easily get annoying). Not wild about [name_f]Edith[/name_f] though. I agree with the other commenters that [name_u]Ruby[/name_u] [name_f]Celestia[/name_f] is gorgeous!
I personally prefer [name_f]Celeste[/name_f]. [name_f]Celestial[/name_f] looks made up to me? Or I’m looking for the missing l at the end (as in “celestial”…)