Does [name]Charles[/name] flow into [name]Arlo[/name] too much?
Also, what do you think of the nickname [name]Chuck[/name]? Or [name]Charlie[/name].
Most of [name]Arlo[/name] is already in Charles. I’m not sure they are an ideal fn/mn combination.
[name]Chuck[/name] suits some people really well, but I tend to prefer [name]Charlie[/name] as a nickname.
I have to agree with dovah, that’s just too much arl for me. I prefer [name]Charlie[/name] to chuck.
I like each name separately, but not sure of combo.
[name]How[/name] about [name]Charles[/name] [name]Wallace[/name] or [name]Arlo[/name] [name]Theodore[/name]? Something classic and spunky.
I agree that [name]Charles[/name] [name]Arlo[/name] seems overly repetitive as a combo, though I think both names are great on their own.
I’m not a fan of [name]Chuck[/name] (which feels a bit outdated to me and always reminds me of woodchucks), but I do love [name]Charlie[/name] (and am, in fact, planning to use [name]Charles[/name] nn [name]Charlie[/name] myself!).
I’ve heard [name]Arlo[/name] used as a nickname for [name]Charles[/name]. Is that an option for you?
Charles Arlo is a no-go for me. If they didn’t share such a prominent sound I wouldn’t mind it. Maybe [name]Charles[/name] [name]Aldo[/name]?
[name]Love[/name] Roseymaam’s idea of [name]Charles[/name] nn [name]Arlo[/name]. Two in one!
What about [name]Carlo[/name] or [name]Carlos[/name]? 