Respondents: 66 (This poll is closed)
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f]
I voted for [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] and [name_f]Edith[/name_f], because I love [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] with [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f]. If I could, I’d use some options as middles and have [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] [name_f]Marie[/name_f]'s little twin sisters as [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] and [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] (or [name_f]Edith[/name_f]), nns [name_f]Evie[/name_f] and [name_u]Kit[/name_u].
Good luck!!
[name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] are the best! [name_f]Every[/name_f] girl get’s her own letter & they all have different sounds. [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Edith[/name_f], and [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] make a sweet set!
As a twin myself, I recommend either (1) giving the twins names that both begin with different letters, or (2) giving the twins the same first initial as their older sister.
The twins are already going to have a solid connection, will be viewed as a twosome, and often treated like an 'item." Therefore, I believe it’s best if their names do not emphasize that they are a pair, separate from their sister. Your older daughter is likely to feel left out of the connection the twins will have with each other, and also left out of the attention that the twins will get from friends and relatives. Using names like [name_f]Edith[/name_f] and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f], while their older sister is [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], will further connect E & E, while leaving out sister C. In the naming process, you can avoid compounding this by giving all three sisters the same first initial, which would help to emphasize the sisters as a threesome (connecting [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] to the twins) – or – by giving each girl her own first initial.
We are also considering [name_f]Edith[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f]
Warmest congratulations @mommareagon,
Excited for you!
I recommend [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] and [name_f]Katherine[/name_f].
Or [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Alice[/name_f] and [name_f]Emma[/name_f].
Or [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Caroline[/name_f] and [name_f]Eleanor[/name_f].
https://nameberry.com/blog/classic-girls’-names-how-to-choose-one-that’s-truly-timeless
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] make a beautiful sibset! All three are timeless classics, elegant, regal names with lots of great associations. It wouldn’t have sounded out of place in the royal family a few hundred years ago nor would it in a family today. All three names have many nickname options from feminine to spunky to tomboyish, or could be used without a nickname.
For [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] [name_f]Marie[/name_f]'s twin sisters…
[name_f]Caroline[/name_f] [name_f]Renee[/name_f] & [name_f]Catherine[/name_f] [name_f]Edith[/name_f]
Bonded by the “C”, but each has her own set of initials.
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Katherine[/name_f], and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] are my favorite.
Oh I love [name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Violet[/name_f]! My vote is for [name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Mabel[/name_f] first with [name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Violet[/name_f] coming in second, only because [name_f]Violet[/name_f] and [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] have similar endings. I love how soft, sweet, and vintage they feel with [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f].
My vote is for [name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Mabel[/name_f]. [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] also work, just a lot safer.
I would say [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] & [name_f]Edith[/name_f] but the nicknames would be problematic… [name_f]Evie[/name_f] & [name_f]Edie[/name_f] are way too matchy. maybe [name_f]Imogen[/name_f] & [name_f]Edith[/name_f]? or [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] & [name_f]Gwyneth[/name_f]?
Good luck!
Couldn’t have said it better
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Katherine[/name_f] & [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] got my vote. I think [name_u]Evelyn[/name_u] & [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] would be sweet together as well.
I actually like [name_f]Edith[/name_f] and [name_f]Elizabeth[/name_f] as a twin set. They’re matchy, which I usually dislike, but they’re different enough that I think it’s actually sweet, and I love the classic feel they share.
[name_f]Edith[/name_f] and [name_f]Violet[/name_f] is probably what I’d choose though - love both names and you avoid leaving [name_f]Charlotte[/name_f] out.
This won’t help, but I just want to say that you have great taste
[name_f]Charlotte[/name_f], [name_f]Edith[/name_f] & [name_f]Violet[/name_f] would be my choice! All lovely and all individual.