Is this too much of a mouthful? I love the name [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] (not sure of spelling yet) and although this is not something I need to decide any time soon, I still like to have ideas. My first girl’s mn will be [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] since that is mine and my moms… Is [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] too much of a mouthful? Would [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] be even more or help seperate it?
For me going from the -ly in [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] and into [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is a bit of a stumble. So I think that having something to break it up would help, like [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u].
I don’t like the trendy -ly sound ending. I think this name would be a lot better as [name_u]Ember[/name_u] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u], plus easier to pronounce as there is no double l.
[name_f]Emberly[/name_f], as in fire embers? Is that a made-up name? If you’re not sure how to spell it, then you can bet it will have to be spelled for others all her life.
I don’t find it hard to say (it actually sounds quite pretty), but others may have trouble with it. [name_u]Love[/name_u] both names, though.
The sentimentality with [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is lovely - I’m a very sentimental namer myself! It compliments [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] nicely, but I do think some people could struggle with the run on? I think [name_f]Rose[/name_f] provides a nice break up, and [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is a beautiful name in my opinion.
Yes, as in fire embers. It has a special meaning to me. In a worship song, it talks about [name_m]Christ[/name_m]'s love fanning from embers into flames… and I want to show my daughter that [name_m]Christ[/name_m]'s love is that big.
[name_u]Love[/name_u] [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u]!
[name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is too much of a mouthful for me but I don’t find adding [name_f]Rose[/name_f] in the middle to be much more helpful. I love the meaning you listed for both so I say go right for [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u]. I rarely call myself by my first and middle and I imagine it would be the same for her.
I don’t know if you’d consider combining [name_f]Rose[/name_f] & [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] into one…? Roselynn, [name_f]Roselyn[/name_f], [name_f]Rosalyn/name_f…I have the feeling that people will end up running [name_f]Rose[/name_f] & [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] together when they say the two names.
[name_f]Emberly[/name_f] is quite pretty; I think the other spelling variant I’ve seen is Emberley. Either way you’ll probably misspellings to deal w/ (Autocorrect wanted to make [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] Eberly & Emberley Amberley), but both spellings are pretty phonetic & I think people would catch on quickly.
I actually like the way [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] sounds! Its not my personal style, but I can see why others would find it pretty!
As for the middle, I do think [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is a bit of a mouthful. [name_f]Emberly[/name_f] [name_f]Rose[/name_f] [name_u]Lynn[/name_u] is a nice way to break it up! Though I’m not sure how I feel about two one syllable middle names, I like the suggestion of [name_f]Rosalyn[/name_f]!!
All that matters though is what you like best. I do love the meaning behind both names, and I think it could definitely work if you truly love it.