I absolutely adore [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]! So handsome.
Not even kidding - my brother’s name is [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_m]Edward[/name_m]!
I vote for [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] would be nice, too.
They’re all great, but I like the 2-3-1 syllable flow of [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] the best. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] would also be dashing.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is charming! I was torn between that and [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u], but in the end, I think I prefer [name_m]Alexander[/name_m]. I have [name_m]Edward[/name_m] on my own list, and have thought of [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m]. [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Harrison[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] or [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Benedict[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] perhaps?
I voted for [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u], very handsome. [name_f]My[/name_f] favorite combo would be [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u].
Absolutely [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]. It’s got that ultimately pleasing six-syllable rhythm, with a different number of syllables in each word. Plus the surprise and quirkiness of [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] is great between the classic [name_m]Edward[/name_m] and [name_u]James[/name_u]. Absolutely winner!
Only downside (and it might be a deal-breaker): I don’t think anyone would want to be [name_m]Edward[/name_m] B. J. Lastname.
I was torn between [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] and [name_m]Fitzroy[/name_m], but ultimately voted for [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] for the flow [name_f]Pam[/name_f] mentions above
As handsome as [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] is, it feels safe compared to these two cool, quirky options.
I love all of them! [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is already one of my favourite combos ever, from your list I guess [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is the best one I like
I voted for [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] in the middle spot, which is a surprise to me, because I’m not fond of it on its own. But my second pick, [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u], had too much eh/ah sound going on for me. I think [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] flows much better.
Thanks guys! I’m loving [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] at the moment ([name_f]Pam[/name_f], I don’t think the initials are a deal breaker for us). I think [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] is a “safer” choice, but who wants to be safe lol.
[name_m]Fitzroy[/name_m] is the only middle with meaning - it’s an honour name for my grandfather, [name_u]Roy[/name_u].
@[name_f]Maggie[/name_f] - I considered [name_m]Theodore[/name_m], but the nicknames for both can be Ted, so I think it’s a bit redundant. Saving [name_m]Theodore[/name_m] for a second son!
I am SO in love with the name [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m]! I wish I could talk my hubby into it. I like both [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] and [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m]. I voted for the [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] combo, because it is a bit more unexpected and I like the flow of [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] better than [name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Alexander[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u]. But they are both gorgeous combos.
[name_m]Edward[/name_m] [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] [name_u]James[/name_u] got my vote. [name_m]Barnaby[/name_m] is energetic and fun, and it balances [name_m]Edward[/name_m] and [name_u]James[/name_u] quite nicely to prevent the name from becoming too heavy or serious.