[name]Hi[/name], [name]Eliza[/name]!
Let me just say that I love [name]Ivy[/name] [name]Katherine[/name] and I think it is a great name for your future daughter. I wanted to point out that I don’t consider [name]Ivy[/name] a classic in the same sense that traditional names like [name]Anne[/name], [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Elizabeth[/name], [name]Katherine[/name], and [name]Mary[/name] are. Rather, I liken it to the vintage set of names that are just now enjoying a resurgence, like [name]Agatha[/name] and [name]Charlotte[/name] - [name]Charlotte[/name] has really enjoyed a coming-of-age, so to speak. Specifically, [name]Ivy[/name] is one in a set of vintage nature names that is coming back on the scene, namely because of celebrity parents choosing such names for their children - [name]Hazel[/name] was chosen by [name]Julia[/name] [name]Roberts[/name] and [name]Violet[/name] was chosen by [name]Jennifer[/name] [name]Garner[/name]. [name]Roberts[/name]’ [name]Hazel[/name] was born at the end of 2004, when [name]Hazel[/name] was #681 on the SSA list of popular names. Today, that name is #294, which is comparable to names like [name]Genevieve[/name], [name]Angelica[/name], and [name]Heidi[/name]. In the case of [name]Hazel[/name], I’d say the name has faced a rather slow climb to the top, and it’s strong, vintage vibe is a sharp contrast to the more flouncy, feminine names popular today - [name]Isabella[/name], [name]Ava[/name], [name]Olivia[/name], [name]Emma[/name], and [name]Sophia[/name]. [name]Garner[/name]'s [name]Violet[/name] was born at the end of 2005, when the name was already #372 on the SSA list, dropping from #739 just five years earlier. Today, the name is #141, which is comparable to names like [name]Piper[/name], [name]Keira[/name], and [name]Melissa[/name]. In the case of [name]Violet[/name], I’d say the name has enjoyed a quicker drop to the top, but it obviously still has a ways to go. [name]Violet[/name], however, has a more romantic, elegant, feminine feel that, though different, is more in keeping with the [name]Sophia[/name]'s and [name]Olivia[/name]'s very popular today. V’s also seem to be a hot topic, so there’s that to consider as well.
Now, let’s return to the case of [name]Ivy[/name]. [name]Ivy[/name] is a vintage nature name with a strong consonant - V - that sets it apart from a very popular natural favorite, [name]Lily[/name], which is comparably floaty and light. [name]Ivy[/name] has a much stronger, harsher image to it, as well, bringing on images of poison ivy and the cold winter season, a la “The [name]Holly[/name] and the [name]Ivy[/name].” Now, none of this is meant to make you think less of the name, because I think it is truly a wonderful, original choice - I’m merely pointing out some things about the name. Now, let’s talk about popularity. Today, [name]Ivy[/name] is ranked at #320 on the SSA list, which is actually a full 22 spots behind where it was last year (#298). It’s comparable to names like [name]Paisley[/name], [name]Emerson[/name], and [name]Juliet[/name], which might seem shocking because [name]Emerson[/name] and [name]Juliet[/name] are also rather “trendy” on NB. However, which names there are going to climb? [name]Emerson[/name] and [name]Juliet[/name], not [name]Ivy[/name] and [name]Paisley[/name] - if you ask me. [name]Emerson[/name] fits into that unisex, surname trend that is popular now, and it has the [name]Emmy[/name] nickname that everyone likes nowadays. [name]Juliet[/name] is a romantic twist on a classic, [name]Julia[/name], that is a nice alternative to [name]Charlotte[/name] and a softer choice than [name]Violet[/name]. Okay, back to [name]Ivy[/name]. Ten years ago, in 2000, [name]Ivy[/name] was ranked #352, which isn’t at all far from where it is now. In fact, I’m guessing if we did an analysis of [name]Ivy[/name]'s popularity over the last ten years, we wouldn’t find anything significant - the name has remained largely in the 300s for ten years, achieving a peak of #298 in 2008 and a low point of #406 in 2003; not a remarkable change at all. Unless a celebrity decided to name her baby [name]Ivy[/name] in the next couple of years, I don’t see this name straying from its spot on the chart in any remarkable fashion. It won’t be the next [name]Emma[/name] or [name]Olivia[/name], I don’t think, and although short names ending in -y are growing more common, I think lighter ones like [name]Lily[/name] and [name]Lucy[/name] are primed to take over, leaving [name]Ivy[/name] as an original, vintage choice for you!
Sorry for the novel…
[name]Lemon[/name]