Which do you prefer [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] or [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]?
[name_f][/name_f]Thanks
Which do you prefer [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] or [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f]?
[name_f][/name_f]Thanks
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]!
I prefer [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]!
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f]
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]! So pretty!
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] Seraphina!! I like the balance of it!
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]
I prefer [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f] [name_f][/name_f], itβs more feminine and " fuller " [name_f][/name_f] ; simply flows better than [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] does
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]
[name_f]Seraphina[/name_f] if itβs a short last name and [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] if itβs a little longer?
[name_f]Love[/name_f] [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]!
Personally I prefer [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] as it is streamlined but still feminine. However in real life it would depend on the flow with the surname.
[name_f][/name_f][name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] [name_m]Smith[/name_m] has too many abrupt endings, so I would go with [name_f]Seraphina[/name_f]. But [name_f]Lark[/name_f] [name_f]Seraphine[/name_f] Lavoie would be absolutely stunning.
[name_f]Lark[/name_f] seraphine