So I’ve posted a couple of recent threads about my dilemma with what had been our #1 name choice, [name_f]Lana[/name_f]. I won’t repost it all here, but if we are unable to get past the pronunciation/spelling/backwards spelling hurdles with [name_f]Lana[/name_f]/Lahna, then the next name on our list is [name_f]Lyla[/name_f] - a name that DH and I both love. I think it’s gorgeous, and I love the simplicity of it.
But my fear is that, although [name_f]Lyla[/name_f] is currently “only” 153 on the charts, it wasn’t even in the top 1,000 until 2005 and skyrocketted up from there - though it seems to have stabilized and even slightly dropped starting in 2009 (see below), so maybe it shouldn’t be such a huge concern. However, when you combine alternate spellings ([name_f]Lylah[/name_f], [name_f]Lila[/name_f], and [name_f]Lilah[/name_f], though I know the latter two can also have the “[name_f]Leela[/name_f]” pronunciation so it’s probably not fair to lump all of those spellings together), that could arguably bump it up to somewhere in the upper 30s in popularity. Of course I know that’s not an entirely reasonable analysis, since many of the other names on the charts would also jump up when alternate spellings are included. It’s not anywhere in the top 50 of the “combined spellings” rankings in this list (2013 Playground Analysis: How combined spellings change the rankings | Nameberry), so that makes me feel better.
Year Rank
2013 153
2012 146
2011 127
2010 134
2009 154
2008 223
2007 367
2006 641
2005 864
Additionally, I also wonder if the style of the name in and of itself is just too trendy right now, given the popularity of names like [name_f]Lily[/name_f], [name_f]Layla[/name_f], [name_f]Lola[/name_f], etc.
In general, like a lot of us, I like names that aren’t common but that aren’t weird or too far “out there”, perhaps familiar even. For instance, my son’s name has been in and around the 200’s in popularity for every year that the social security database has existed. Aside from just loving his name in and of itself, I love the fact that it’s remained steady over time and never had any drastic dips or surges in popularity.
One of my big concerns is that I will choose a name that will “date” my daughter in the future or easily allow her to be lumped into the decade or generation in which she was born (think [name_f]Jennifer[/name_f], [name_f]Brittany[/name_f], [name_f]Nancy[/name_f], etc.). Am I completely insane to have this fear with a name that is currently sitting at 153 on the charts?
I hadn’t thought about the potential for the name being misheard, so that’s definitely something to consider as well.