[name_m]Just[/name_m] a quick question…I have one son whose middle name is [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m] and husband is keen on [name_u]Forest[/name_u] as a middle for our next son.
Are these the perfect middles for brothers or does it seem tacky (like a shepherd in the forest or something 
)?
I know I’m overthinking this, but I’m having a baby in the next week or so 
please share your thoughts!
I’d like [name_u]Everett[/name_u] for the middle name, but hubs would prefer a word name.
Shepherd and [name_u]Forest[/name_u] seem lovely together to me! 
They are perfect for brothers! It’s as if there’s a very subtle connection, but not something immediately obvious. It’s a wonderful sweet spot.
Shepherd and [name_u]Forest[/name_u] are cute together. I don’t think they’re overly matchy or tacky
They’re cute! The connection feels too distant to be tacky… since you wouldn’t really find a shepherd in a forest, more like in fields or maybe on a mountain.
At most, you might describe them as both relating to animals/nature, but they relate to it in different ways (landscape vs occupation) so it feels very subtle.
I think [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m] & [name_u]Forest[/name_u] make a very cute set! Not cheesy, but sweet 
@katkabet Aww thank you so much! You can expect another announcement very soon 
Thanks for putting my mind to ease everyone! We’ll make our final decision when he arrives 
I don’t think it’s tacky at all, I think they’re cute together 
Shepherd and [name_u]Forest[/name_u] are lovely for a sibset! They go together very well, but the pair also doesn’t stick out like a sore thumb as being super matchy.
I love [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m] and Iike [name_u]Forest[/name_u]. On two different boys, it would be fine.