[name_m]Hi[/name_m] guys,
I have a new GP on my list and I’d like some opinions or thoughts on it before I move it to my main list.
The name is:
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_u]Keats[/name_u]
Sounds pretty usable to me. Quite handsome.
I love the name [name_m]Hugo[/name_m] its on my main list it is completely usable to me,[name_u]Keats[/name_u] is very cute to.
It sounds perfectly usable to me. I personally know three [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]'s, and it is a very handsome combination.
Very handsome. I am a fan of short, strong names and this one fits the bill.
I adore [name_m]Hugo[/name_m]. I would, however, immediately think that [name_u]Keats[/name_u] was a surname but that might just be me. They sound lovely together – but again, to me it sounds like a full name.
That is exactly the thing that made me keep it as a GP for so long, so I totally see what you’re saying 
Thanks to all for your comments!
It’s a lovely name. It does sound like a full name, but it doesn’t really matter since you would rarely say his first and middle name together, especially without his surname.
I’m just echoing all the previous posters, but I love [name_m]Hugo[/name_m], and it does sound incredibly handsome with [name_u]Keats[/name_u]. Definitely deserves to go on the main list. 
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_u]Keats[/name_u] is great. Both are very handsome and complement eachother well.
I like it. Maybe make it a two syllable middle name so it flows better? That’s of course depending on the last name
I think it’s definitely useable
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] is SO handsome and I love the flow and sound of the combo as a whole. It’s also completely usable in my books
[name_m]Hugo[/name_m] [name_u]Keats[/name_u] is really handsome yet cute. And def usable.