[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] [name_m]Hall[/name_m]
Or
[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_m]Hall[/name_m]
Or neither/other suggestions?
[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] [name_m]Hall[/name_m]
Or
[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_m]Hall[/name_m]
Or neither/other suggestions?
[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] [name_m]Hall[/name_m] has a better flow to it, imo.
I also prefer the former. Much less jarring having the two one-syllable names next to each other in this combination imo.
[name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_f]Elodie[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] sounds better [name_f]IMO[/name_f]. I like [name_f]Paloma[/name_f]!
I personally like [name_f]Paloma[/name_f] [name_u]Quinn[/name_u] without [name_f]Elodie[/name_f].