Oh, interesting. Let’s see…
[name_f][/name_f]
The Ancient Civilization names are fascinating, but entirely too grand to use for me. I love [name_f]Marcella[/name_f], [name_f]Cressida[/name_f], [name_m]Isidore[/name_m] and [name_m]Cassander[/name_m] though, and am intrigued by [name_m]Johari[/name_m].
[name_f][/name_f]
Showgirl is not my style at all – and yet, the list has several of my favourites! [name_f]Farrah[/name_f], [name_f]Vivienne[/name_f] and [name_f]Salome[/name_f] have been on various lists of mine, and I might give [name_f]Evara[/name_f] a chance as well. From the [name_m]German[/name_m] perspective, it’s funny to see [name_f]Sabine[/name_f] in this category: It topped the charts all through the 60s here, making it the[name_f][/name_f] grandma name right now – so more suited for category 4.
[name_f][/name_f]
The Soulful names are a hard-to-grasp category. Like it says in the post, spirituality can mean a lot of things, and I think you’re right that that’s a great part of their appeal, especially the potential to mean different things to different people. The search for purpose and stability during interesting times probably adds to it further. From the list, I enjoy [name_f]Dove[/name_f], [name_m]River[/name_m], [name_f]Evangeline[/name_f], [name_f]Selah[/name_f], [name_m]Shepherd[/name_m] and [name_f]Vera[/name_f], although I wouldn’t have thought to sort some of them into this category.
[name_f][/name_f]
The [name_m]Boomer[/name_m] revivals show that trends used to be more different across countries than they are now – faster communication has made the world a lot smaller. I like several of these names, but don’t associate them with the older generation: [name_f]Gloria[/name_f] I would have sorted in the previous category, [name_f]Gwen[/name_f], [name_m]Lenny[/name_m], [name_m]Jay[/name_m] and [name_m]Robin[/name_m] actually feel quite youthful to me, and while I am aware that [name_f]Nancy[/name_f] and [name_f]Cynthia[/name_f] are granny names, they don’t feel[name_f][/name_f] that way. It’s not that I don’t see the appeal of “old people names” on babies though, there are several [name_m]German[/name_m] [name_m]Boomer[/name_m] names I’d totally use: [name_m]Wolfgang[/name_m], [name_f]Kerstin[/name_f], [name_m]Norbert[/name_m], [name_m]Joachim[/name_m], Berry-favourite [name_f]Ingrid[/name_f], as well as the the included here [name_f]Judith[/name_f] and [name_m]Ralph[/name_m].
[name_f][/name_f]
Romantasy seems like it’s almost[name_f][/name_f] my style: [name_m]Evander[/name_m], [name_m]Lysander[/name_m], [name_f]Bronwen[/name_f] and [name_m]Ambrose[/name_m] are just ever so slightly too grand for everyday life. I also enjoy the somewhat “quieter” [name_m]Emrys[/name_m], [name_f]Carys[/name_f] and (especially!) [name_f]Tamsin[/name_f], although I wouldn’t describe any of them as “strongly gendered, fanciful choices”. [name_m]Magnus[/name_m] I could even see myself using. And, again, hilarious to see [name_f]Sabine[/name_f] on this list.
[name_f][/name_f]
The Vowel Hiatus is a great example of the world getting smaller: It was the[name_f][/name_f] name trend that [name_m]Knud[/name_m] Bielefeld (the blogger responsible for the closest thing we have to official name data here) pointed out two years ago. They’re not for me though. They feel childish to me – unsurprisingly given that they’re currently trending. I have to say though, [name_f]Eloa[/name_f] and [name_f]Riya[/name_f] from this list have caught my interest.
[name_f][/name_f]
The Numbers aren’t for me at all. While I love the idea of a IV going by [name_m]Quade[/name_m] or [name_f]Ivy[/name_f], they’re just not birth certificate material. If I had to pick one, I’d go with solid and simple [name_f]Una[/name_f].
[name_f][/name_f]
I thought the [name_m]Utah[/name_m] names would be entirely too wild for me, but I guess I’ve either softened (as in letting names be names) or hardened (as in nothing can shock me) over the years. I love [name_f]Fern[/name_f] and [name_m]Rockwell[/name_m], [name_f]Coco[/name_f] even used to be on my list (until I heard, no idea if it’s true, that that’s the [name_m]South[/name_m] American equivalent of what US-based children would call a number two
[name_f][/name_f] ). [name_m]Oaks[/name_m] and [name_m]Bronson[/name_m] aren’t bad either, and [name_f]Scotlyn[/name_f] is perfect character name material.
[name_f][/name_f]
The [name_f]Anime[/name_f] names are nice. I wouldn’t use them, not just because I have zero connection to anime, but I love how they have character without being complicated. [name_f]Momo[/name_f] used to be on my list, a friend of mine used [name_m]Kaito[/name_m] in the middle spot last year (I’ve been wondering if anime was the inspiration there!), and I also enjoy [name_m]Jinu[/name_m], [name_f]Nami[/name_f], [name_m]Renji[/name_m], [name_f]Rin[/name_f], [name_f]Rumi[/name_f] and [name_f]Yumi[/name_f] – so, most of them, even if only from afar. [name_m]Rudo[/name_m] could be an interesting update on Rudy/Rudolph.
[name_f][/name_f]
I’ve noticed the Lit names trending, too! Especially [name_f]Bronte[/name_f] seems to be popular on the forums. [name_f]My[/name_f] favourite here is [name_m]Bram[/name_m], although [name_m]Fielding[/name_m] is a close second. A (different) friend used [name_m]Konrad[/name_m] in the middle spot some years ago, and [name_m]Cedric[/name_m] almost made our shared list for if R had been a boy.