[name]Iwona[/name] - I want to say [name]Iona[/name], or even Iowa.
[name]Lu[/name] - a spunky but sweet nn for [name]Lucy[/name].
[name]Lake[/name] - the sentiment is nice, but it’s not particularly imaginitive.
[name]Dinah[/name] - seems 80s to me … I much prefer [name]Diana[/name], although that does make me think of car crashes, conspiracy theories and the overbearing statue in Harrods …
Benedicte - how unusual! I really like this one, with the spunky nn [name]Bennie[/name].
[name]Celine[/name] - quite pretty, but also very [name]Dion[/name].
Alber - I feel like it should be [name]Albert[/name] (which I think is quite handsome, and definitely interesting).
[name]Miranda[/name] - satisfying to say, and quite pretty.
[name]Camilla[/name] - I’m actually not a huge fan of this, although I know a lot of others love it.
[name]Ailsa[/name] - so vintage, pretty and charming, but I also a little spunky; I love this one!
[name]Shan[/name] - seems a little … short.
[name]Robyn[/name] - a trendy spelling coupled with a somewhat dated name, makes an unhappy Twinkle
[name]Cali[/name] - as a nn for [name]Calliope[/name], [name]Calanthe[/name] et cetera, I quite like this one.
[name]Violetta[/name] - pretty, but I prefer the gorgeous [name]Violet[/name].
[name]Zara[/name] - [name]Phillips[/name].
[name]Mattie[/name] - a spunky nn for [name]Matilda[/name], which I adore.
[name]Fae[/name] - I love the fairy association, but not so much the name itself.
[name]Ida[/name] - I love this unusual, pretty yet simple choice.
Thais - gorgeous.
[name]Marcella[/name] - quite nice.
Levitt - I’m not sure … I prefer [name]Everett[/name].