Sorry, NB timed out a while back, so I’m posting now…
[name]Ashley[/name],
Let me address your questions first. Definitely, I think that style is more important in choosing a sibling set than length. So, a sibling set of [name]Rose[/name] and [name]Mary[/name] makes more sense than a set of [name]Rose[/name] and [name]Kailey[/name]. Length is something to consider, but it wouldn’t be a deal-breaker for me. Personally, most of the names I like for girls are longer - [name]Lydia[/name], [name]Emmeline[/name], and [name]Beatrix[/name] - but then there’s [name]Charlotte[/name], and I don’t think she’d feel out of place. As for the issue of [name]Elizabeth[/name] and [name]Jane[/name] as sisters, the length difference is rather large, but that didn’t stop the [name]Bennet[/name]'s - or [name]Jane[/name] [name]Austen[/name], rather - from naming two of their five daughters those very names. Actually, the [name]Bennet[/name] sisters are a perfect example of style winning out over length. [name]Jane[/name], [name]Elizabeth[/name], [name]Mary[/name], [name]Catherine[/name] “[name]Kitty[/name],” and [name]Lydia[/name] represent a variety of lengths, especially since [name]Kitty[/name] solely uses her nickname, yet they blend into a beautiful, striking sibling set. Okay, on to your list…
[name]Amelia[/name] nn [name]Amy[/name]
[name]Caroline[/name] nn [name]Carrie[/name]
[name]Eliza[/name] nn [name]Lizzie[/name]
[name]Elizabeth[/name] nn [name]Lizzie[/name] or [name]Libby[/name]
[name]Frances[/name] nn [name]Fanny[/name] or [name]Fancy[/name]
[name]Georgia[/name] nn [name]GiGi[/name]
[name]Jane[/name] nn [name]Janie[/name]
[name]Katherine[/name] nn [name]Katie[/name] or [name]Kitty[/name]
Off your list, I think I like every name. Well, I like some more than others - my favorites are [name]Caroline[/name], [name]Eliza[/name], [name]Frances[/name], and [name]Jane[/name]. I like [name]Amelia[/name], but not so much the [name]Amy[/name] nickname; I’d choose [name]Mia[/name] or [name]Lia[/name] instead, myself. [name]Amelia[/name] [name]Gardner[/name] is a very nice name. [name]Gardner[/name] is your last name, yes? [name]Caroline[/name] is really a perfect name - I love it! [name]Eliza[/name] has an edge over [name]Elizabeth[/name], for me, as it feels just that much more original and vintage. [name]Lizzie[/name] is a great, versatile nickname, too! I’m in love with [name]Eliza[/name] [name]Gardner[/name]. [name]Frances[/name] is so cute, and I wish more people would use it - [name]Fancy[/name] as a nickname is interesting, though I think I’d go with [name]Frankie[/name], myself. I’m not in love with [name]Georgia[/name], honestly - something about it is holding me back. [name]Georgiana[/name] or [name]Georgina[/name], even, seem more regal and fun and appealing, and the [name]Gigi[/name] nickname, with your last name, is lovely. [name]Jane[/name] [name]Gardner[/name], again, is a very cute name. My friend ([name]Jane[/name] [name]Elizabeth[/name]) goes by [name]Janie[/name], but only to her mother. [name]Katherine[/name] is the epitome of classic elegance, I think, but [name]Katie[/name] is so, so overdone at this point! [name]Kitty[/name] is a really cute nickname, I agree, but I like the spunky - “snappy” - nicknames of [name]Kat[/name] and [name]Kit[/name] even more! If I were naming your daughter off of this list, I’d choose [name]Eliza[/name] [name]Frances[/name] [name]Gardner[/name] - I love that, and I’d love to be named that, myself!
The only other names I can think to suggest are [name]Clara[/name] ([name]Clare[/name]), [name]Charlotte[/name] ([name]Lottie[/name], [name]Charlie[/name]), [name]Maria[/name] ([name]Mamie[/name]?), [name]Louisa[/name] ([name]Lou[/name], [name]Lulu[/name]), and, of course, my ultimate favorite - [name]Lydia[/name] (Lyddie).
[name]Lemon[/name]