Respondents: 56 (This poll is closed)
I adore [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f]. It’s perfect with [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] and [name_f]Lydia[/name_f]: Classic, but totally at place with many modern names. I think the flow on some of the names is a little off, but this is perfect.
I really like [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] and [name_f]Caroline[/name_f] with [name_f]Lydia[/name_f], but I think [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] strikes a great chord between [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] and [name_f]Lydia[/name_f]. [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] or [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] would ultimately be my favorites for your set.
My vote went to [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f]. I think [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] fits well with [name_m]Jackson[/name_m] & [name_f]Lydia[/name_f]. I also like [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] [name_f]Abigail[/name_f].
I agree that the flow is off. I like all of the names separately, but can’t find the right fit with the family name we really want to use. [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] was always one of my favorite names! Hubby didn’t like it the first time around so I was surprised that it’s made it this far!
I absolutely love [name_f]Susannah[/name_f], but can’t find an “A” name that hubby likes besides [name_f]Anne[/name_f] and [name_f]Abigail[/name_f]. I may just nix the initial thing and pick a different middle name all together!
[name_f]Sadie[/name_f], [name_f]Caroline[/name_f], and [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] are my top 3 so this comment was perfect for my side of the vote 
Thanks for your vote! [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] is one of my husband’s top picks but it’s slowly grown on me… it’s such a pretty name when you write it in cursive 
[name_f]Susannah[/name_f] is my favorite of your options! I think it is absolutely wonderful with [name_f]Lydia[/name_f]. I also like [name_f]Abigail[/name_f], but the two together are a bit of a mouthful. Still, [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] would be my top choice. I also like [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] and [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] with sister name.
[name_u]LOVE[/name_u] [name_m]Jackson[/name_m], [name_f]Lydia[/name_f] and [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f]! Also love [name_f]Caroline[/name_f] [name_f]Joanne[/name_f], [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] [name_f]Joanne[/name_f], [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f] and [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] (so basically all of them :)).
You have so many nice options here! I agree with you and pp that [name_f]Caroline[/name_f], [name_f]Susannah[/name_f] and [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] are my top picks. [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] especially is a nice middle ground between your other children’s names.
I lovethe name [name_f]Felicity[/name_f], and it is a nice match for [name_f]Lydia[/name_f], but it seems a little different compared to [name_m]Jackson[/name_m]. Sibling matchiness is not the end-all be-all, though, and it’s a beautiful name.
[name_f]Laura[/name_f] and [name_f]Beth[/name_f] both seem a little out-dated compared to your others, though I like them both on their own. I would probably put [name_f]Rebecca[/name_f] in this category, too, though something about [name_m]Jackson[/name_m], [name_f]Lydia[/name_f], and [name_f]Becca[/name_f]/[name_f]Becky[/name_f] could be cute!
Thanks for your opinion! I agree with you completely! If we had used [name_f]Laura[/name_f], [name_f]Felicity[/name_f], or [name_f]Beth[/name_f] first I think I’d like them more. My husband has decided that [name_f]Laura[/name_f] and [name_f]Felicity[/name_f] are his top votes so it looks like we at least cut out a few options! I can’t come around to [name_f]Laura[/name_f] because I know people where we live would pronounce it “[name_f]Lara[/name_f]” and I don’t love that 
After more discussion we’ve narrowed it down to:
[name_f]Caroline[/name_f] [name_f]Joanne[/name_f]
[name_f]Felicity[/name_f] [name_f]Anne[/name_f] or
[name_f]Susannah[/name_f] [name_f]Abigail[/name_f] (still debating middle names. If we don’t go with an A it’d be [name_f]Jane[/name_f] or [name_u]Rae[/name_u])
Hubby reminded me that as much as I love [name_f]Sadie[/name_f] we had agreed NOT to use it with our first for a reason that still exists ”