I, or we (my husband and I) have been struggling with names for our daughter.
These two names, though, I keep coming back to and REALLY like the sound of them (although I went away from [name]Marlow[/name] in the last couple of days because [name]Sienna[/name] [name]Miller[/name] named her daughter this and it turned me off, but I really love the sound of it, so I came back to it).
[name]Marlow[/name] [name]Sinclair[/name]
[name]Sinclair[/name] [name]Louise[/name] ([name]Louise[/name] is a family name, but will take other suggestions)
Our last name begins with an L and is one-syllable.
Brothers are [name]Camden[/name] and [name]Beckett[/name].
Thanks and sorry for yet another post about more names…I have been needy of you berries lately!
I went to school with a girl named [name]Marlowe[/name], who was named after [name]Christopher[/name] [name]Marlowe[/name], and I grew to like her name well enough, though it’s nms. (I appreciated the literary connection more when I got to college and had actually read something by [name]Christopher[/name] [name]Marlowe[/name]!) However, I prefer either [name]Marlowe[/name] or [name]Marlo[/name] to [name]Marlow[/name], which for some reason just doesn’t look right to me.
With a brother named [name]Beckett[/name], I think the Sir [name]Thomas[/name] [name]Beckett[/name] / [name]Christopher[/name] [name]Marlowe[/name] associations would pop up in some people’s minds, but they’re good associations; I think it’s the kind of thing people in more educated circles might notice, but that the population as a whole probably wouldn’t.
I like [name]Sinclair[/name] for a boy, but I just can’t picture it on a girl.